Showing posts with label 18th century. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 18th century. Show all posts

Jan 12, 2016

Comments on Elliott's Imperial Spain under Isabelle and Ferdinand and the Habsb

“One must be careful of books, and what is inside them, for words have the power to change us.” —Cassandra Clare, The Infernal Devices
"For the better or for the worse." -- John Daly
On Wednesday, the 9th of December, nine members of the club met to discuss Imperial Spain: 1469-1716 by J. H. Elliott. (A couple more contacted me after the meeting reporting problems that prevented their attendance.) Fittingly for the December meeting, the Kensington Row Bookshop was decorated for the season and cookies were served.


A Theory of History

About 10,000 years ago, agriculture began to be practiced by our species. By increasing the amount of food supplied and its dependability, agriculture allowed population size to grow. But the spread of agriculture across continents could not have been rapid. For millenia hunger was a regular part of human existence; in Hobbs phrase, it was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short".


Wikipedia estimates:
The world population in 35,000 BCE is estimated to have been around 3 million people, all of whom subsisted as hunter-gatherers. The population had increased to around 15 million at the time agriculture emerged in around 10,000 BCE. By contrast, it is estimated that around 50–60 million people lived in the combined eastern and western Roman Empire in the 4th century CE
Today people live in nation-states that control virtually all the the land on earth, and have created multinational organizations such as the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the World Trade Organization that have global programs doing what the nation states can not themselves do. World population reached 7 billion in about October  2011. The United Nations estimates it will increase to 11.2 billion in the year 2100. More is produced and consumed than ever before. Men have walked on the moon, robotic vehicles have explored some of the plants, and space vehicles have mapped them all,

This has not been achieved by a plan, but rather by muddling through, with many small plans for limited objectives, and even many of these have failed or been only partially successful, For ever two steps forward, one has had to be given up to retreat. Spain from 1469 to 1716 deals with an important culture at an important time. This was a time in which new wealth was entering world commerce, many European nations were modernizing their governments (while Spain lagged) and the modern age had almost arrived in Europe.

The early part of this period saw the Catholic Monarchs succeed in ending Muslim presence in the Iberian peninsula. Then Spain and Portugal gained huge. rich colonies in the Americas, established trading routes from Europe to Asia and established more colonies and trading entrepôts in Asia. At the end of the period, the Hispanic peoples took a huge step back from those successes as the empire collapsed. Elliott seems to suggest that a lot of this history was the result of kings and their subordinates muddling through.

Elliott shows how the huge amounts of gold and silver were raised to fund government activities over this long period. He also goes into detail on how government action emerged from conflict among social classes and among geographic regions -- it was anything by the well organized execution of a rational master plan. Kings and aristocratic leaders were doing the best they could with institutions that were often inadequate raising needed finance or directing the far flung agents of government. Thus seen in one way, Elliott's book is a confirmation that muddling through during this period and in this region worked well, but then stopped doing so. But while Spain was suffering its reverses, other nations were making progress. The book thus involves a serious theory of how government reacts to unforeseen fortuitous and disastrous event, or at least how Spanish governments reacted in the 15th to the 18th century..

Background

Sir John Elliott is a very distinguished historian, well known for his works on Spanish history. This book was originally selected because members felt we should know more about Spanish history, especially during the period in which Spain colonized much of the Americas -- after all, much of the United States was first colonized by Spain -- we are an American club even as we deal broadly with world history,. Beginning the book in 1469 allows the author to begin with the ascendancies of Isabella and Ferdinand, well before the 1492 sailing of Columbus; the final date indicates that the War of the Spanish Succession was over, and Phillip the V had extended Castilian rule over Catalonia and the Basque country.

Here is the Amazon summary of the book:
Since its first publication, J. H. Elliott's classic chronicle has become established as the most comprehensive, balanced, and accessible account of the dramatic rise and fall of imperial Spain.  Now with a new preface by the author, this brilliant study unveils how a barren, impoverished, and isolated country became the greatest power on earth—and just as quickly fell into decline. 
At its greatest Spain was a master of Europe: its government was respected, its armies were feared, and its conquistadores carved out a vast empire. Yet this splendid power was rapidly to lose its impetus and creative dynamism. How did this happen in such a short space of time? Taking in rebellions, religious conflict and financial disaster, Elliott's masterly social and economic analysis studies the various factors that precipitated the end of an empire.
Some videos that are helpful in understanding the book:
As you read the review, you might find it useful to have some Spanish music to listen too. Here is a guitar playing Granada from Albeniz' "Suite Española"

The Iberian peninsula of course had a history before 1469. The various tribes inhabiting the peninsula had been conquered by the Romans, who occupied the territory for centuries. However, as the Roman Empire fell, tribes from the north swept into the area taking political and economic control -- notable the Vandals and the Visigoths

Muslim armies swept up the peninsula to the border of France. I quote from Wikipedia:
The Umayyad conquest of Hispania was the initial expansion of the Umayyad Caliphate over Hispania, largely extending from 711 to 788. The conquest resulted in the destruction of the Visigothic Kingdom and the establishment of the independent Emirate of Cordova under Abd ar-Rahman I, who completed the unification of Muslim-ruled Iberia, or al-Andalus (756–788). The conquest marks the westernmost expansion of both the Umayyad Caliphate and Muslim rule into Europe. 
Forces commanded by Tariq ibn Ziyad disembarked in early 711 at Gibraltar at the head of an army consisting of Berber Northwest Africans and Arabs. He campaigned his way northward after the decisive Battle of Guadalete against the usurper Roderic. By 717, the Berber-Arabs had crossed the Pyrenees onto Septimania and Provence (734).
 Al-Andalus under the Umayyads

Source: Fred the Oyster - via Wikipedia
The Reconquista had restored Christian domination of the peninsula with the exception of Granada in Andalusia by 1469, leaving only a small portion of the deep south under Muslim rule

Below is a map of the peninsula showing the Catholic crowns of Castile and Aragon as well as the Islamic territory of Granada, with the dates that the territories were incorporated into the Spanish empire. According to Wikipedia:
The Iberian Union was the period between 1580 and 1640 during which the Crown of Portugal was in dynastic union with the Spanish Crown, bringing the entire Iberian Peninsula, as well as Spanish and Portuguese overseas possessions, under the Spanish Habsburg kings Philip II, Philip III and Philip IV of Spain. 
The Iberian Peninsula Showing the Dates Territories were Reconquered by Spain


As the book starts, the last stage of the Reconquista is being prepared.

It is important to realize not only that the political organization of the Iberian peninsula was different in the 15th century than it is today, but that the concepts of states too were different. Thus the Crown of Aragon at the end of the 15th century was composed of the Kingdom of Aragon, the Principality of Catalonia, the Kingdom of Valencia in the Iberian Peninsula, and the Kingdom of Majorca (the Balearic Islands), but it also included the Kingdom of Sicily, the Kingdom of Sardinia. (Thus five kingdoms and one principality were united under the Crown, recognizing a single ruler -- the King of Aragon.) Each of the major subordinate units within a Crown had its own form of government and its own local governors. A new King of Aragon (like a new rulers of Castile or Portugal) occupied the top post, generally without too great a disruption of the governments of the subordinate kingdoms and principalities. Note that Isabella and Ferdinand had a special agreement that each was the co-ruller of others Crown, during their lives,
"The 15th century saw a series of wars between the Kings of Aragon and the Counts of Provence. In 1423 the army of Alphonse of Aragon captured Marseille, and in 1443 the forces of Aragon captured Naples, and forced its ruler, King René I of Naples, to flee. He eventually settled in one of his remaining territories, Provence.......Louis XI of France (was crowned in 1481 and Provence was legally incorporated into the French royal domain in 1486." (Source)
The 15th and 16th centuries in Europe obviously fell between the middle ages and the onset of modern times. They were a time in which some key areas of technology changed, as did the processes of religion, government, war, agriculture, manufacturing, and much else.The global context of the history of Spain in the 15th and 16th century includes:
  • The conflict between Islamic peoples and Christian peoples, which saw the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453, was partially resolved in the west in 1492 by the completion of the Reconquista of the Iberian peninsula by Christians. The emphasis of the conflict toward Austria after 1453 when the Ottomans sought to move north through the Balkans. (In 2012 the club read The Enemy at the Gate: Habsburgs, Ottomans, and the Battle for Europe by Andrew Wheatcroft.)
  • During the entire period after the Middle Ages, European rulers were seeking to extend the areas that they ruled, and to do so had to better finance their governments. The 17th century European states (except Spain) succeeded in modernizing governmental institutions.
  • There were many armed conflicts among European states achieved some success. Notably, for much of the period discussed in this book, Spanish lands were at war in France, the Netherlands, Italy and/or England,
  • The Reformation and Counter-Reformation. These can be considered to have begun with the posting of Luthor's Ninety-Five Theses. Of course the period say the rise of protestant churches which came to enroll states in northern Europe, This of course weakened the Roman Catholic Church, which in response created the Counter-Reformation, (The club had previously read and discussed The Reformation: A History by Diarmaid MacCulloch.). 
  • The Renaissance (from the 14th to the 17th century), which started in Italy and spread across Christian Europe. Humanism is associated with the Renaissance, but perhaps played a distinct role in some of the theme of Elliott's book. Other aspects of the Renaissance certainly did.
  • In 1453, with the fall of Constantinople, the Silk Road allowing trade between Asia and Europe was closed. That led to exploration around Africa seeking a new trade route, and settlements by Europeans along the coast of Africa. The Portuguese and Spanish were well placed to lead this exploration due to their location on the south-western point of Europe.
  • 1455 also saw the first books printed using movable type -- the Gutenberg Bible. Printed books became more common after 1455 while hand copied books continued to be produced. Still religious, scientific and other learned tracts became much more available as time went by,
  • "The 15th through 17th century saw widespread development in gunpowder technology throughout the Old World. During the 15th and 16th centuries, these developments were more advanced in India and Persia than in Europe, but by the 17th century, technological progress in Europe led to application of gunpowder on a scale and to an effect unprecedented anywhere else, both in warfare and in civil engineering. " Wikipedia
  • The fortuitous discovery of America by Columbus (1492) also led to the rapid conquest of large areas of North, Central and South America by Spain and Portugal, the Colombian Exchange of plants, animals and diseases, and relatively quickly to a huge transfer of gold and silver from New World mines to Spain.
A map of the Spanish and Portuguese Empires in the period of Iberian Union under the personal union of the Spanish monarchs (1580–1640)
Part I of the Book

A context for the first part of the book -- that dealing with the Catholic monarchs of Castile and Aragon (Isabella and Ferdinand) is the completion of the reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula from the Muslims. It also saw the expulsion of the Jews and Muslims. 

Of course, the region had been part of the Roman Empire, and then occupied Vandals and Visigoths. The Muslims after sweeping through North Africa, invaded Europe via the Iberian Peninsula and were not stopped until the reached the Pyrenees and the French  The Christians on the Peninsula began to take back the land, supported by the rest of Europe, with the notable support of the papacy, By 1468 only Granada was in Muslim hands, the rest of the peninsula was Christian.

While there were many trained and experienced warriors among the Christians, how were they to be paid? The union of Castile and Aragon was a start, since a large area of the region was now under under the Queen of Castile and the King of Aragon, each of whom made the other co-monarch of her/his own domain.

The book focuses on an important economic development -- the development of the woolen cloth industry. A large wool market existed in the north of Castile. The Catholic Monarchs arranged that wool from that market would be transported to a port on the north coast of the Iberian peninsula, from there to be taken by convoy to France where it would be processed into cloth. Not incidentally, this made taxes on the wool easier to collect and a large source of income. A further step was to fence a large area of (relatively poor soils) in the highlands of Castile and reserve them for sheep. Thus the book presents us with an example of commercialization of agriculture to serve the state's need for money.
A member complained during our meeting that while the book was full of descriptions of people and events, she felt is lacked clear organizing principles. (Perhaps, in defense of author Elliott, he might have assumed the readers would have a broad understanding of the historical situation and processes of the time which would have served that need,)
I suggest that "muddling through" is that organizing principle. 
Isabella and Ferdinand worked first to undo damaging changes that had been made to earlier practices in the years before their elevation to office. They also succeeded in bringing Castile and Aragon closer together, especially by each recognizing the other as co-monarch over her/his inherited domain. Their work was complicated in that they did not have the modern understanding of administration that has developed over the centuries since they lived. Especially, they did not have the experience of developing professional civil service that we now enjoy.

They were successful in putting together the money to fund a large army, and with that army to defeat Granada and capture the remaining parts of Andalusia from the Muslims. Their expulsion of the Jews led to the loss of that population with its wealth and business experience a serious blow to Castile and Aragon, and indeed the entire Iberian peninsula.

They had good luck, especially in that Columbus discovered America, and America proved to be rich in gold and silver as well as domestic plants. it quickly proved to be a captive and lucrative market for European exports, all of which were shipped on Spanish vessels; hundreds of years of experience fighting Muslims had prepared the Spanish to accomplish exception conquests with tiny forces. None of this could have been imagined when Isabella and Ferdinand agreed to finance the expedition, 

Part I of the book emphasizes the many factions involved in policy making with regard to raising funds, organizing the government, conducting military affairs, and conducting relations with the Muslim opposition, The royals themselves, the aristocrats (who were by no means united, and indeed could have various factions for a single issue). the church, the leading townsmen, the lower class townsmen and the peasant farmers. The Inquisition existed, and the church's influence depended in part on that institution, as well as the papacy, the many thousands of priests and other employees; it was especially influential in promoting the crusade to reconquer all of the land on the Iberian peninsula from the Muslims.

Here the muddled through successfully, and had the good luck to find a route to Asia and to discover a new world filled with riches.

Part II of the Book

A Habsburg Dynesty ruled Castile during the period covered by the larger part of the book. When Isabella died in 1505, her grandson, Charles V, was the clear inheritor of the position of King of Castile, but was to wait 18 years his majority to assume his duties, The Union of Crowns was preserved during these years, and Charles V was therefor also to be the King of Spain ruling over possessions of Spain in the Americas, Sicily and southern Italy. He was a Habsburg as a result of the complex mating rituals practiced by the royals. His descendants ruled for about a century.

He was also elected Holy Roman Emperer, which brought him large territories in Europe as seen in the map.


Charles V's European and Mediterranean Territories
(North African Territories Added After the Reconquista)
Source: Wikipedia
Map of the empire of Roman Emperor Charles V (as king of Spain Charles I).    Castille    Aragon    Burgundian possessions    Austrian hereditary lands    Holy Roman Empire

The obvious implication of the map is that it placed a lot of ground under the control of Charles V (if he and his descendants could hold it). Charles and his advisers were faced by a protestant revolt against the Catholic control of the Netherlands, It devoured money, as Charles had to send troops via Flanders after traveling across a lot of Europe. The royal cashbox was always bare, and from time to time Charles V would have to borrow large sums of money -- exacerbating the problem since he did not reduce expenditures on the Roman Empire, but would need to pay more and more interest.

The 16th century began well for Charles V in terms of the Spanish possession in the America. Since Columbus had landed in the Caribbean, the first explorations started there, and continued in Florida, However, more propitious discoveries were made in Mexico and the Andes, where large populations of relatively highly organized Indians were found, and even more to the Spanish liking, large deposits of Silver.


DECADE Value (million pesos) GOLD (tonnes) SILVER (t)
1503­-1510          1.18                        5.0                      0
1511­-1520          2.18                        9.2                      0
1521­-1530          1.17                        4.9                      0
1531­-1540          5.58                      14.5                    86
1541-­1550        10.46                      25.0                  178
1551­-1560        17.86                      42.6                  303
1561-1570        25.34                      11.5                  943
1571­-1580        29.15                        9.4                1119
1581­-1590        53.20                      12.1                2103
1591-­1600        69.60                      19.5                2708



Expansion of European Empires 
through the 17th, 18th and 19th Centuries

Source
As Spanish moved to the Americas to exploit the land and the Indians, supplied with silver and gold as well as a variety of local products that would at least have had interest value in Europe, these immigrants to the Americas began to demand European goods -- wine, foods that could not be obtained in local Mexican or Peruvian markets. Not only did Castile take the largest share as the largest Kingdom in Spain, it made the Americas part of the Kingdom of Castile,

Apparently, the impact of European diseases on American natives who had not been exposed to them had not been predicted, The Indian populations were decimated by disease (and other things) and the labor force greatly reduced over time. The gold and silver became harder to find and to get out of the ground (although Potosi was an amazing mine). Improved silver recovery technology was developed to get more pure silver per ton of ore, but still silver production went down,

Early on there was a windfall of money and it goods that could have been produced in Spain were imported at lower prices. It was noted that the innovators -- people engaged in commerce who would detect problems or unmet needs -- were disappearing. The King and the leading aristocrats didn't seem to recognize these as the grave problems that they would become, or at least didn't propose solutions that worked. Muddling through would not be enough;

The anger of the peripheral states at the Spanish King and at Castile increased. I quote from Wikipedia:
From 1630 onward, the Dutch Republic came to control almost half of Brazil's area at the time, with their capital in Recife. The Dutch West India Company (WIC) set up their headquarters in Recife. The governor, Johan Maurits, invited artists and scientists to the colony to help promote Brazil and increase immigration. The Portuguese won a significant victory at the Second Battle of Guararapes in 1649. On 26 January 1654, the Dutch surrendered and signed the capitulation, but only as a provisory pact. By May 1654, the Dutch demanded that the Dutch Republic was to be given New Holland back. On 6 August 1661, New Holland was formally ceded to Portugal through the Treaty of The Hague.
Recall that (Wikipedia)
The Iberian Union was the period between 1580 and 1640 during which the Crown of Portugal was in dynastic union with the Spanish Crown.
 And recall further that
The Catalan Revolt (1640–52) saw Catalonia rebel with French help against the Spanish Crown for overstepping Catalonia's traditional rights during the Thirty Years' War. Most of Catalonia was reconquered by the Spanish monarchy but Catalan rights were recognized. Roussillon was lost to France.
And (according to Wikipedia)
The Portuguese Restoration War......began with the Portuguese revolution of 1640 and ended with the Treaty of Lisbon in 1668.
Elliott suggests that the Portugese followed the lead of the stronger Catalan-French battle for Catalan freedom, and with Catalan success Portugal too gained it freedom from Spain, 

A critical moment in the conflict between Islam and Christianity was 1453, when Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Empire. (The History Book Club read 1453: The Holy War for Constantinople and the Clash of Islam and the West by Roger Crowley.) This effectively blocked Christian Europe from access to Asian goods which they had been obtaining via the Silk Road. (The club also read The Silk Road in World History by Xinru Liu.) This in turn led to efforts to find a new route to Asia, notably by ship around Africa. The Iberian peninsula had an advantage in this effort due to its geographical location and direct access to the Atlantic. Thus in 1492, when Grenada fell, it was not strange that Castile and Aragon chartered Columbus' voyage to seek a direct Western route to Asia, assuming that the earth was indeed spherical. What was unexpected was that Columbus discovered the Americas and not Asia, (Muddling though!)

The conquest of Constantinople also opened a route into Europe for the Ottoman armies through the Balkans, and thus a serious threat of Islamic intrusion into the eastern lands of Christian Europe. (The club had also read The Enemy at the Gate: Habsburgs, Ottomans, and the Battle for Europe by Andrew Wheatcroft.) With this new threat, European Christians sought to reorganize to be able to bring forces to oppose invading Islamic forces; money would be a problem. The Holly Roman Empire, by its size and wealth would be an obvious leader.


Division of the Iberian Peninsula into Political Units
at Different Times, Showing the Reconquista

In 1492 the Kingdom of Castile and Leon was the largest Christian kingdom, with Aragon and Portugal somewhat smaller, the Muslim Kingdom of Granada on the coast in the south, the Kingdom of Portugal on the west, and a small Kingdom of Navarre on the east, But the history of these kingdoms remained alive, Thus the Kingdom of Aragon (in addition to its lands outside of the peninsula) included Aragon, Catalonia and Barcelona. Barcelona had a history as a trading state, dominating sea trade in the north western Mediterranean -- a powerhouse of commerce. Aragon's history included a key role in the defense of the frontier. Catalonia had its own language (with many French roots) and cousins over the border living on French territory. Muddling through never succeeded in bringing Aragon and Castile needed to make Spain a single state serving a single nation, That was more true of the failed experiment with unification of Portugal and Spain, The muddling through approach to unification of Spanish and Moors. the Catholics, Protestants and Jews failed even more dramatically,

In the 17th century there was again a change of dynasty -- from Habsburg to Bourbon, from Austrian to French. It was decided on after the War of the Spanish Succession, A french Bourbon ruler was duly installed in Madrid, and many of the innovations introduced in French government structure and function came to Spain. The Austrians stripped Spain of the territory it had held in Italy and the surrounding Mediterranean Islands.

It would be a shame not to mention the magisterial final section that author Elliott provides to the book, titled "Epitaph to an Empire". In the previous chapters he has delved in great detail to who held what position of what issue related to what decision. It was this detail (involving people the non-historian reader would often soon forget) that so annoyed out member (cited above). In the final section of the book Elliot points out how great were the accomplishments of Spain under Isabella and Ferdinand as well as under the early Habsburgs. The world still has the imprint of those accomplishments. Looking at governments and the people who run them today, one wonders if we have really made advances in 400 years.

Apologies for the late posting of this discussion of Elliott's book on Imperial Spain. The holidays, and a lasting problem with allergies were responsible, John Daly

Oct 17, 2015

Discussion of Foner's Short History of Reconstruction


Nine members of the History Book Club met on Wednesday evening, October 14th, at the Kensington Row Bookshop. It was a lovely evening, with a touch of coolness in the air.

Future Books

We began by choosing a book to be discussed in the future. That discussion was based on a blog post suggesting alternative books on international organizations, Scandinavian history, Iberian history, and a late entry of a book of economic history by Angus Deaton, the new Nobel Laureate in Economics. We chose The Sea Wolves: A History of the Vikings by Maryland author Lars Brownworth,

Eli the owner-manager of the Bookshop, who has been so helpful to us for the past several years, had put out copies of ten of the books under discussion, which greatly facilitated our decision. I note that quite of few of them were purchased from the Bookshop before we left. Contact Eli (kensington.books@verizon.net) if you want Sea Wolves or any others on the list.

We noted that the Kensington Row Bookshop is the distribution point in the USA for books in the Catalan language and has a reading room with books in the Catalan language. Given their hospitality and their expertise club members felt we should know more about Catalonia. Moreover, Catalan independence from Spain is likely to become an important issue in the coming year given the recent election of a pro-independence local government recently, Catalonia is the economic driving force of Spain today, and has a history which in many ways is different that that of the rest of Spain, Thus we agreed we would like to read a book on Catalan history, but neither of those suggested seemed to fit the bill. Therefore recommendations of good, readable Catalan histories are sought. Add them as comments to this post, or send them to John.Daly@gmail,com.


The Post Civil War Reconstruction

The book chosen for this discussion was A Short History of Reconstruction, Updated Edition by Eric Foner. It is a newly updated abridged edition of the 1988 classic work, Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution. That book when it was first published won the Bancroft, Parkman, and Los Angeles Times Book Prizes. Foner's The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery (2010) won the Pulitzer Prize for History, Lincoln Prize, and the Bancroft Prize. For many years a professor of history at Colombia University, Foner has served as president of the Organization of American Historians, the American Historical Association, and the Society of American Historians.

Allen, one of our members, in early August had provided a review of the book in which he followed common practice and divided the Reconstruction into three phases:
  1. Presidential Reconstruction under President Andrew Johnson,
  2. Radical Reconstruction when as a result of the elections of 1868, radical republicans took control of the Congress (and Grant replaced Johnson as President), and
  3. The end of Reconstruction, when Republicans lost enthusiasm for many of the elements of the radical program and the panic of 1873 led to a depression. (We noted that the corruption that had occurred in Reconstruction programs also had political fallout in the Congress and in Republican support for the institutions of Radical Reconstruction.)
A member, starting out the discussion, said that the Civil War had established two things:
  1. That the United States of America is one nation, indivisible (the original Articles of Confederation stressed that the Union was to be perpetual); and
  2. Slavery was no longer to be tolerated in the USA.
While there were physical damages resulting from the war to be repaired, he stressed that the Reconstruction was going to be mainly about institution building.
  1. Political institutions would have to be adjusted. Freedmen would have to be given rights in the new political and legal institutions, while those who had committed treason in their leadership of the Confederacy would have to have their rights as U.S. citizens adjudicated. Temporary government institutions in the former Confederate states would have to be created and then replaced.
  2. Labor related institution had to undergo a major change; slavery was no longer to be legal, and some new alternative to link workers to enterprises had to be created in the formerly slave states. After false starts, eventually tenant farming emerged in the plantation system, in which plantation owners supplied tools and seed, and tenant farmers supplied labor, with the crop divided between the owners and the workers.
  3. Former slaves created a number of important cultural institutions for themselves, such as nuclear families, churches, schools, clubs, and other associations. The tenant farmers had rights to the land that they worked; they housed their families on that land, and grew subsistence crops as well as the market crops which were contractually shared with the plantation owner.
He mentioned that Eric Foner had chosen to set the dates of the Reconstruction as beginning in 1863 (when the Civil War was still far from ended) to 1877 (when Rutherford B. Hays won a hotly contested election by making a deal with the Democrats to not oppose contested electors in return for his withdrawing all troops from the Southern states; the 1876 election was marked by suppression of the black vote in much of the south by the KKK and other white militias, as well as by appointment of electors by State governors who did not vote as the state's citizens had instructed in the election.).

The Impeachment of President Johnson

A member asked for help understanding the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson. Another, one quite knowledgeable about the U.S. history of the period, responded that he was quite disappointed in the books' sketchy treatment of the impeachment.

Andrew Johnson was from Tennessee, a former slave owner and a Democrat. He was added to the ticket by President Lincoln in the 1864 election to provide balance (and draw votes that would not have gone to Lincoln with a radical Republican running mate). However, the two had quite different views. Here is what one source says on Johnson's views.
Johnson believed the Southern states should decide the course that was best for them. He also felt that African-Americans were unable to manage their own lives. He certainly did not think that African-Americans deserved to vote. At one point in 1866 he told a group of blacks visiting the White House that they should emigrate to another country. 
He also gave amnesty and pardon. He returned all property, except, of course, their slaves, to former Confederates who pledged loyalty to the Union and agreed to support the 13th Amendment. Confederate officials and owners of large taxable estates were required to apply individually for a Presidential pardon. Many former Confederate leaders were soon returned to power. And some even sought to regain their Congressional seniority. 
Johnson's vision of Reconstruction had proved remarkably lenient. Very few Confederate leaders were persecuted. By 1866, 7,000 Presidential pardons had been granted. Brutal beatings of African-Americans were frequent. Still-powerful whites sought to subjugate freed slaves via harsh laws that came to be known as the BLACK CODES. Some states required written evidence of employment for the coming year or else the freed slaves would be required to work on plantations.
Johnson quickly ran into grave legislative difficulties with the Republican Congress, difficulties that were only exacerbated when the election of 1867 returned a still more radical group of Republicans to control the House of Representatives/

(The Military Reconstruction Act, vetoed by Johnson and overridden by the Congress in 1867, divided the South into five military districts under federal control and imposed strict requirements on southern states in order for them to be re-admitted to the Union. Johnson also vetoed the Tenure of Office Act and that veto too was overridden in 1867.) When Johnson sought to remove Generals Sheridan, Sickles and Pope from their commands of southern military districts, radical Republicans charged that he was seeking to repeal Reconstruction. Johnson then sought to fire Secretary of War Stanton. (Johnson continued his defiance of Congress and named General Lorenzo Thomas as the new Secretary of War. Three days later the House of Representatives voted impeachment on a party-line vote of 126–47 on the vague grounds of "high crimes and misdemeanors," with the specific charges to be drafted by a special committee. The Senate failed to convict Johnson by one vote.)

Some of the key players in the Senate trial of Johnson were mentioned.

A member recommended Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln's Legacy by David O. Stewart as an excellent book on the impeachment.

40 Acres and A Mule

General Sherman on his famous march began distributing land to "contraband" -- slaves who had escaped to the Union forces. Early in Reconstruction this process was emulated by distributing abandoned land and land confiscated from Confederate leaders to former slaves.

We noted that while many slaves had experience growing subsistence crops on land put aside for that purpose on the plantations, those slaves were supplementing rations of corn meal distributed by the plantation owners. That is a much less demanding task than running a working farm. It would perhaps have been asking too much of recent slaves to run working farms unless the Freedman's Bureau had been able to supply a great deal of financial assistance and training to the new farmers.

A member asked who were the people who successfully homesteaded land under the Republican led program opening the west. Another answered that he believed they had been farmers who were moving to new homesteads; they in fact knew how to run a farm.

Early in the Reconstruction, the land that had been distributed to former slaves was taken back by the government and given back to plantation owners.

Restoring the Southern Plantation and Export Agriculture to Productivity

The members spent considerable time discussing this topic.

Source: "U. S. Slavery"
The United States had assumed huge debts during the Civil War, and reducing the debt had to be a major preoccupation for national leaders. That meant restoring production and restoring exports.

Here are data on U.S. cotton exports in the latter half of the 19th century:
  • in 1860 cotton goods were the #1 export of the USA with a value of 58 million 1914 US$
  • in 1880 they were the #3 export with a value of 97 million 1914 US$
  • in 1900 they were the #7 export with a value of 196 million 1914 US$
  • in 1929 they were the #4 export with a value of 364 million 1914 US$
Cotton in the early 20th century was a great business for the United States. The cotton growing are was very productive and the cotton bales could relatively easily be gotten to ports. When the cotton gin was invented and when it became common in the cotton plantations at the end of the 18th century, the most labor intensive part of production of cotton fiber was mechanized: the cost of cotton fiber went way down. This event was simultaneous with the mechanization of cotton cloth production in the industrial revolution, and factories in England and the north of the USA began to produce large quantities of high quality cotton cloth at low costs. They quickly came to dominate global markets, and English cotton cloth was even exported to India -- up till then one the world's greatest producer of cotton cloth.

Members noted that a lot of southern cotton bales were shipped north even during the Civil War. There was a brisk smuggling trade, notably up the Mississippi River. Thus the factories in the northern states were able to continue operating, We thought the Union blockade of Confederate shipping had been more successful in blocking cotton exports to Europe, and to feed its factories the British had begun to grow cotton in Egypt and the Sudan, and had increased cotton production again in India. Thus, after the war, Southern cotton was exported into a global market for cotton fiber and faced competition. Prices tended to go down.

A member noted that there was a lot of cotton produced in the Confederacy during the Civil War that was not smuggled out. In the burning of Charleston, for example, bales of cotton exceeded the capacity of the warehouses, and were stored in the streets of the city. When the fires started in confiscated cotton, they spread to the bales piled in the streets, and from the huge conflagration in those bales, spread to houses, stores and government buildings, essentially destroying the city. Those dangerous bales of cotton would have been exported before the Civil War.

Of course, the plantation owners in the cotton growing region wanted to return their plantations to profitably growing and exporting cotton. They were joined by influential people in the north who saw business profits from cotton. Thus, there was a natural confluence of interests between those who wanted to retire government debt using export duties on cotton, those who wished to obtain profits growing cotton on their plantations, and those who wish to make profits buying and selling cotton and producing cotton cloth. This did not bode well for early Reconstruction efforts to redistribute plantation land and give it to former slaves to run as small farms.

The ultimate solution to institutionalizing labor-plantation relations in the cotton region was share cropping. Increasingly share cropping benefited owners more than share croppers (who were white as well as black). But the government, the intermediaries and the cloth producers also benefited, Even the share cropping families had some security on the land, roofs over their heads, and places to grow some food for the table and even some produce for the market -- something of which many had dreamed as slaves.


Source: "37 maps that explain the American Civil War"
The map source also provided this information:
The Civil War freed the slaves, and Reconstruction temporarily granted them basic political rights. But the settlement of the war made no provision for land reform or economic redistribution. The federally owned land of the West was secured for free (largely white) owner-operated farms, but the basic underpinnings of the Southern plantation economy were left intact. Newly freed slaves owned no land or farm equipment, and had little in the way of formal education. With Southern governments from the 1870s onward uninterested in providing any of those things, most of the rural black population was forced into a particularly unremunerative form of tenant farming known as sharecropping. In exchange for land to till, seeds to plant, and basic equipment, the sharecropper would do all the work and hand a large share of the proceeds over to the landowner. Discriminatory enforcement of laws against "vagrancy," barriers to education and the professions, and discrimination on railroads and other public accommodations made it exceptionally difficult for sharecroppers to move from job to job or bargain for better conditions.
There was another means for whites to obtain black labor. Blacks were arrested for vagrancy or other minor crimes and quickly brought before a justice of the peace who convicted and fined them. The person convicted would then be required to pay the fine and court costs, and if he did not have the funds to do so would be placed in jail; few could pay. The sheriff would then rent out the labor of the jailed (almost entirely black) men in the form of chain gangs. Thus mine, factory and plantation owners could rent chain gangs to do the labor needed at very low costs -- an armed sheriff's deputy guard would be included in the deal. (The club discussed a book on this topic some time ago -- Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II by Douglas A. Blackmon.)

(We did not talk much about the other plantation crops -- rice, sugar cane and tobacco -- but it is not unreasonable to assume that similar processes occurred in the regions in which they were produced for the international market.)

The Piedmont and Highlands of the South

These highlands were less suited to the export crops discussed above. In consequence, they were held in small farms rather than large plantations, and the white farmers living on them had few if any slaves. Before the Civil War, these white farmers often differed from the plantation owning class on many issues, but it was the latter that obtained political power. 

The position of these white, small-farm owners during the Civil was conflicted. They were the ones that seceded from Virginia to create West Virginia and who brought the new state of West Virginia into the Union, providing troops for the Union forces. But many also supported and fought for the Confederacy.

Those remaining in the southern states after the Civil War again sought political power on the state level, but eventually were again to loose influence in favor of the richer plantation owning class.

Racism



Racism was and remains the original sin of the United States of America. Northerners were racist as well as whites in the south, and relatively few in the north were comfortable giving voting rights to the freed slaves. While women by the hundreds moved to the south to teach in the new schools opened for black children, there were limits to how much whites in the north were willing to be taxed to help blacks in the south to recover from slavery.

The Ku Klux Klan and similar white militias were institutionalized in the south as a southern white response to the Union's efforts to improve the status of southern blacks, and especially to the increased political and economic clout that the black population was gaining in the south. The KKK was willing to use large scale violence to enforce the racism of southern whites. When Rutherford B. Hayes withdrew the Union troops from the south there was no force there capable of protecting the black population from the southern militias.

A member asked if, since there were many black Union soldiers, there had not been black armed resistance in the south to the KKK and similar white groups, The response was that indeed there had been battles between armed blacks and armed whites in some places in the south after the Civil War, but the KKK and its allies established dominance.

Short Attention Span in the North, Long Term Aid Requirements in the South and Southern White Resistance

Reconstruction ended 12 years after the end of the Civil War. That is not much time to remake a social order, to rebuild political and economic institutions, and to undo the damage done to a people by centuries in slavery. Yet a member suggested that the American public seems often to tire of difficult tasks of this kind. Think of the decision not to join the League of Nations after World War I, the election of President Eisenhower to end the war in Korea, the antiwar movement which resulted in a chaotic departure of U.S. diplomats and military from Vietnam, and the election of Barack Obama who promised to bring the troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq.

It was justly pointed out that there were important reasons that Reconstruction ended. The Union military force of volunteers ended, to be replaced by professional military services. The professional army was cut in size again and again in the post Civil War period until it numbered some 35,000; they were barely enough to garrison the south or fight the Indian wars in the west, but not sufficient to do both. Then the panic of 1873 led to a five year depression, and adding to a huge debt from the Civil War that had still to be paid, increased tax payer unwillingness to finance Reconstruction programs.

A member asked if there were attractive investment opportunities for private investors during this period that also competed with funding of government Reconstruction programs. Obviously, a lot of money was being invested in new railroads and in the development of lands newly opened by those railroads.

Unfortunately, it can take a lot longer than 12 years to change key political, economic or social institutions. Ask a Russian or a Ukranian how long it is taking to build successful new political and economic institutions in those countries after the fall of Communism. Similarly, institution building efforts in the foreign assistance program have often proven to have taken much longer than originally estimated, or to have failed entirely. (Americans may have underestimated the long term investments that are required as the Reconstruction began, as many still do today.)

Southern whites were not ignorant of their own interests, and wanted to keep political power, to maximize their income and wealth, and to maintain the antebellum social stratification and their privileged place within it. Many were skilled politicians and could use those skills to protect their interests. Others had long experience and good contacts for making money; some of whom still were relatively affluent after the war, and money talks. Moreover, the southern whites were not adverse to using violence to achieve their goals.

The combination of Union unwillingness to stay the course, the intrinsic difficulty of achieving the changes that the radical Republicans hoped for, and the effective resistance of many southern whites to the Reconstruction, eventually gravely limited its success.

Rosenwald


One of the pleasures of these meetings is that we enjoy getting off track and talking occassionally (as Monty Pyshon might say) about something completely different. A couple of members had seen the new movie Rosenwald. IMDB describes the movie as
a documentary about how Chicago philanthropist Julius Rosenwald, the son of an immigrant peddler who rose to head Sears, partnered with Booker T. Washington to build 5,400 Southern schools in African American communities in the early 1900s during the Jim Crow era. Rosenwald also built YMCAs and housing for African Americans to address the pressing needs of the Great Migration. The Rosenwald Fund supported great artists like Marian Anderson, Woody Guthrie, Langston Hughes, Gordon Parks, and Jacob Lawrence. Among those interviewed are civil rights leaders Julian Bond, Ben Jealous and Congressman John Lewis, columnists Eugene Robinson and Clarence Page, Cokie Roberts, Rabbi David Saperstein, Rosenwald school alumni writer Maya Angelou and director George C. Wolfe and Rosenwald relatives.
Of course, the movie is relevant to the Reconstruction, or at least to the work that still needed to be done to help the victims of slavery as late as the early 20th century. It is noted that the  Ridgeley Rosenwald School in Prince Georges County (next door to our club's county) is one of the best restored Rosenwald schools in the country, and likely to be worth a visit.

Pat Conroy

Pat Conroy today is one of America's foremost authors, whose books include The Prince of Tides, The Lords of Discipline, and The Great SantiniTwo of his novels, The Prince of Tides and The Great Santini, were made into Oscar-nominated filmsOur member, Joe. is going to a party in South Carolina to celebrate Conroy's 70th birthday. Joe told us a little about meeting Conroy when Joe was a 24 year old, just starting his teaching career and Conroy was a 15 year old student who had been assigned to Joe's writing class.

Joe ran a hard class. Students had to make a book report every two weeks, and had to complete a class project. They also had to write a letter to the editor, and correct and improve it until it was publishable. (One week, late in the semester, the letters to the editor sections of the Washington Post and the Washington Star were completely devoted to the letters from students in the class.)

Conroy selected an analysis of William Falkner's novels for his semester project. Evry other week he gave a book report on a Falkner novel. The final project report was so good it not only rated a top grade, but Joe told Conroy that he should become a professional writer. Joe also alerted the school principal that Conroy was exceptional -- worth keeping an eye on during the future.

(How many of us who have taught have the privilege of teaching such a student, or indeed were capable of teaching him so well.)

Final Comment

Some members read Foner's Short History of the Reconstruction while others read the longer Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877. The opinions of members of the shorter book were all over the map -- A couple of members loved it (and went out to buy the longer book to read in the future), while others found the book hard to follow and too condensed. Note the comment above by one member who found the lack of coverage of Andrew Johnson's impeachment a major failure of the book.

The club has read a number of books relating to the Civil war in the four years of observance of the 150th anniversary of that war. It seemed appropriate in 2015, 150 years after General Lee's surrender at Appomattox to General Grant, to shift attention to the Reconstruction. Historian Foner is probably the best regarded writer on the Reconstruction.

Note that the rules for book selection are that the book should be relatively short to be easily read in a month, that it should if possible be available in paperback, and of course that it should be selected by members attending. Thus the longer Foner books on the Reconstruction seemed not to fit our guidelines. Moreover, two members who had read the short history recommended it strongly to the other members of the club. While the book's value was not agreed upon in the meeting, compromises sometimes fall short of excellence in historical works as in other spheres.

Other Materials of Possible Interest Related to the Reconstruction

A member posted three times on his blog on the book:
Open Yale offers a course titled THE CIVIL WAR AND RECONSTRUCTION ERA, 1845-1877. It is taught by Professor David W. Blight and is free online. The online material includes a syllabus, and 17 sessions each with some printed material and a streaming video of Prof. Blight's lecture.

The Wikipedia entry on the Reconstruction Era.

Note on the Book Club

The History Book Club has been meeting monthly in Montgomery County, Maryland since July 2002, While typically 10 to 20 members show up to discuss books in person, the mailing list includes about 100 people who are informed of the club's selections and who receive notification of books selected by the club members for reading.g

The club blog has just passed 10,000 page views, and recent summaries of book discussions are viewed 100 to 200 times; some reach 400 page views or more. We are delighted that others find our posts interesting. All are welcome.

Aug 29, 2015

Possible Books for November 2015 -- Part II


Cathy writes: "Since we have read a few Spanish related books, would we be interested in another to fill out our understanding/" She identified the following possibilities. (I have deleted those with fewer than 4 stars on average, and those that exceed our page length preference.)

World Without End: Spain, Philip II, and the First Global Empire by Hugh Thomas. 4.5 stars (Goodreads). 496 pages (300 pages of text). Here is the New York Times review of the book.
Following Rivers of Gold and The Golden Empire and building on five centuries of scholarship, World Without End is the epic conclusion of an unprecedented three-volume history of the Spanish Empire from “one of the most productive and wide-ranging historians of modern times” (The New York Times Book Review).

The legacy of imperial Spain was shaped by many hands. But the dramatic human story of the extraordinary projection of Spanish might in the second half of the sixteenth century has never been fully told—until now. In World Without End, Hugh Thomas chronicles the lives, loves, conflicts, and conquests of the complex men and women who carved up the Americas for the glory of Spain.

Chief among them is the towering figure of King Philip II, the cultivated Spanish monarch whom a contemporary once called “the arbiter of the world.” Cheerful and pious, he inherited vast authority from his father, Emperor Charles V, but nevertheless felt himself unworthy to wield it. His forty-two-year reign changed the face of the globe forever. Alongside Philip we find the entitled descendants of New Spain’s original explorers—men who, like their king, came into possession of land they never conquered and wielded supremacy they never sought. Here too are the Roman Catholic religious leaders of the Americas, whose internecine struggles created possibilities that the emerging Jesuit order was well-positioned to fill.

With the sublime stories of arms and armadas, kings and conquistadors come tales of the ridiculous: the opulent parties of New Spain’s wealthy hedonists and the unexpected movement to encourage Philip II to conquer China. Finally, Hugh Thomas unearths the first indictments of imperial Spain’s labor rights abuses in the Americas—and the early attempts by its more enlightened rulers and planters to address them.

Written in the brisk, flowing narrative style that has come to define Hugh Thomas’s work, the final volume of this acclaimed trilogy stands alone as a history of an empire making the transition from conquest to inheritance—a history that Thomas reveals through the fascinating lives of the people who made it.

Imperial Spain: 1469-1716 by J. H. Elliott. 4.4 stars, 448 pages (386 pages of text). Here is a brief review of the book. Here is a video of an interview of Sir John Elliott on his life as a historian. Selected for December 2015!
Since its first publication, J. H. Elliott's classic chronicle has become established as the most comprehensive, balanced, and accessible account of the dramatic rise and fall of imperial Spain.  Now with a new preface by the author, this brilliant study unveils how a barren, impoverished, and isolated country became the greatest power on earth—and just as quickly fell into decline. 
At its greatest Spain was a master of Europe: its government was respected, its armies were feared, and its conquistadores carved out a vast empire. Yet this splendid power was rapidly to lose its impetus and creative dynamism. How did this happen in such a short space of time? Taking in rebellions, religious conflict and financial disaster, Elliott's masterly social and economic analysis studies the various factors that precipitated the end of an empire.
Conquistador: Hernan Cortes, King Montezuma, and the Last Stand of the Aztecs by Buddy Levy. 4.6 stars. 448 pages (330 pages exclusive of Appendices, etc.) Here is a TED talk by Buddy Levy.
In this astonishing work of scholarship that reads like an edge-of-your-seat adventure thriller, acclaimed historian Buddy Levy records the last days of the Aztec empire and the two men at the center of an epic clash of cultures perhaps unequaled to this day.  
It was a moment unique in human history, the face-to-face meeting between two men from civilizations a world apart. In 1519, Hernán Cortés arrived on the shores of Mexico, determined not only to expand the Spanish empire but to convert the natives to Catholicism and carry off a fortune in gold. That he saw nothing paradoxical in carrying out his intentions by virtually annihilating a proud and accomplished native people is one of the most remarkable and tragic aspects of this unforgettable story. In Tenochtitlán Cortés met his Aztec counterpart, Montezuma: king, divinity, commander of the most powerful military machine in the Americas and ruler of a city whose splendor equaled anything in Europe. Yet in less than two years, Cortés defeated the entire Aztec nation in one of the most astounding battles ever waged. The story of a lost kingdom, a relentless conqueror, and a doomed warrior, Conquistador is history at its most riveting.
Imprudent King: A New Life of Philip II by Geoffrey Parker. 4.0 stars, 456 pages (375 pages of text) Here is a review of the book. Here is an interview with Geoffrey Parker.
Philip II is not only the most famous king in Spanish history, but one of the most famous monarchs in English history: the man who married Mary Tudor and later launched the Spanish Armada against her sister Elizabeth I. This compelling biography of the most powerful European monarch of his day begins with his conception (1526) and ends with his ascent to Paradise (1603), two occurrences surprisingly well documented by contemporaries. Eminent historian Geoffrey Parker draws on four decades of research on Philip as well as a recent, extraordinary archival discovery--a trove of 3,000 documents in the vaults of the Hispanic Society of America in New York City, unread since crossing Philip's own desk more than four centuries ago. Many of them change significantly what we know about the king. The book examines Philip's long apprenticeship; his three principal interests (work, play, and religion); and the major political, military, and personal challenges he faced during his long reign. Parker offers fresh insights into the causes of Philip's leadership failures: was his empire simply too big to manage, or would a monarch with different talents and temperament have fared better?
The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936-1939 by Antony Beevor. 4.0 stars. 560 pages. Here is a review of the book.
A fresh and acclaimed account of the Spanish Civil War by the bestselling author of Stalingrad and The Fall Of Berlin 1945  
To mark the 70th anniversary of the Spanish Civil War's outbreak, Antony Beevor has written a completely updated and revised account of one of the most bitter and hard-fought wars of the twentieth century. With new material gleaned from the Russian archives and numerous other sources, this brisk and accessible book (Spain's #1 bestseller for twelve weeks), provides a balanced and penetrating perspective, explaining the tensions that led to this terrible overture to World War II and affording new insights into the war-its causes, course, and consequences.
The Last Days of the Incas by Kim MacQuarrie. 4.7 stars, 522 pages (462 pages of text)  Here is a CSPAN book talk by author MacQuarrie on this book.
The epic story of the fall of the Inca Empire to Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro in the aftermath of a bloody civil war, and the recent discovery of the lost guerrilla capital of the Incas, Vilcabamba, by three American explorers. 
In 1532, the fifty-four-year-old Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro led a force of 167 men, including his four brothers, to the shores of Peru. Unbeknownst to the Spaniards, the Inca rulers of Peru had just fought a bloody civil war in which the emperor Atahualpa had defeated his brother Huascar. Pizarro and his men soon clashed with Atahualpa and a huge force of Inca warriors at the Battle of Cajamarca. Despite being outnumbered by more than two hundred to one, the Spaniards prevailed—due largely to their horses, their steel armor and swords, and their tactic of surprise. They captured and imprisoned Atahualpa. Although the Inca emperor paid an enormous ransom in gold, the Spaniards executed him anyway. The following year, the Spaniards seized the Inca capital of Cuzco, completing their conquest of the largest native empire the New World has ever known. Peru was now a Spanish colony, and the conquistadors were wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. 
But the Incas did not submit willingly. A young Inca emperor, the brother of Atahualpa, soon led a massive rebellion against the Spaniards, inflicting heavy casualties and nearly wiping out the conquerors. Eventually, however, Pizarro and his men forced the emperor to abandon the Andes and flee to the Amazon. There, he established a hidden capital, called Vilcabamba—only recently rediscovered by a trio of colorful American explorers. Although the Incas fought a deadly, thirty-six-year-long guerrilla war, the Spanish ultimately captured the last Inca emperor and vanquished the native resistance.
Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America 1492-1830 by John H. Elliott. 4.8 stars, 608 pages (411 pages of text). Here is a review of the book. See above for a video of an interview with Sir John Elliott.
This epic history compares the empires built by Spain and Britain in the Americas, from Columbus’s arrival in the New World to the end of Spanish colonial rule in the early nineteenth century. J. H. Elliott, one of the most distinguished and versatile historians working today, offers us history on a grand scale, contrasting the worlds built by Britain and by Spain on the ruins of the civilizations they encountered and destroyed in North and South America.
Elliott identifies and explains both the similarities and differences in the two empires’ processes of colonization, the character of their colonial societies, their distinctive styles of imperial government, and the independence movements mounted against them. Based on wide reading in the history of the two great Atlantic civilizations, the book sets the Spanish and British colonial empires in the context of their own times and offers us insights into aspects of this dual history that still influence the Americas.
The order given above in that from Cathy. I find the books by Elliott, Thomas and Parker the most interesting. JAD

A Book About Montgomery County

Montgomery County: Centuries of Change by Jane Sween. 4.35 stars (average between Amazon and Goodreads), 254 pages. Jane Sween was the Montgomery County Historical Society librarian for 30 years. Its library is named after her.
An in-depth and impressive account of Montgomery County, Maryland's illustrious history, from its 1776 birth as a leader in the battle for freedom, to its emergence as a technological and economic force in the shadow of the nation's capitol.
239 years ago, Thomas Sprigg Wootton introduced a bill in the Maryland General Assembly on September 6, 1776, to divide Frederick into three counties---Frederick, Montgomery, and Washington. This book was not selected for Book Club discussion, but it was thought that many members would want copies for their home libraries. It was thought that a second edition is now available via the Montgomery County Historical Society. Several members asked Eli to have the Kensington Row Bookshop procure copies that they might purchase.