Jun 29, 2015

Possible Books for September 2015


Irish History (This is a reduced list after the discussion in June.)

Guerilla Days in Ireland: A Personal Account of the Anglo-Irish War by Tom Barry. 242 pages, 4.8 stars. This was written by one of the IRA flying squad members in the late 40's and was very influential in the liberation movements of the 1950's and 1960's. Plus it is a first person history of the conflict. Here are some reviews of the book from GoodReads.

The Irish War of Independence by Michael Hopkinson. 274 pages, 4.5 stars (but only 4 reviews) The Irish War of Independence was a sporadic guerrilla campaign taht lasted from January 1919 until July 1921. Michael Hopkinson makes full use of the recently opened files of the Bureau of Military Archives in Dublin, which contain valuable first-hand contemporary accounts of the war, meticulously piecing together the many disparate local actions to create a coherent narrative. The first half of this from History Ireland reviews the book.
We considered a historical novel for the first time, and postponed the decision to a later meeting.
A Star Called Henry (Last Roundup) by Roddy Doyle. 400 pages, 4.0 stars. Born at the beginning of the twentieth century, Henry Smart lives through the evolution of modern Ireland, and in this extraordinary novel he brilliantly tells his story. From his own birth and childhood on the streets of Dublin to his role as soldier (and lover) in the Irish Rebellion, Henry recounts his early years of reckless heroism and adventure. At once an epic, a love story, and a portrait of Irish history, A Star Called Henry is a grand picaresque novel brimming with both poignant moments and comic ones, and told in a voice that is both quintessentially Irish and inimitably Roddy Doyle's. Doyle is a winner of the Booker Prize and perhaps the best living Irish writer. Here is The New York Times Review of the Book.  Here is a video of  Roddy Doyle on the book from the Abbey Theater. Here is the trailer for Terry Gilliam's film from the book. This review from an Irish reader: "Certainly a page turner it is a fiction from the perspective of a 'foot soldier' in Dublin IRA. It clearly shows that behind the men of action are a group from whom the soldiers will always be excluded. This group will assume power when the New Day dawns, as such groups do worldwide."

As 2015 Comes to a Close, Anniversary Books

A Short History of Reconstruction, Updated Edition by Eric Foner. (Unrated 2015 edition, but previous versions highly rated) 352 pages. From the “preeminent historian of Reconstruction” (New York Times Book Review), a newly updated abridged edition of the prize-winning classic work on the post-Civil War period which shaped modern America. Here is a review of the bookHere is a video discussion of the earlier, longer book on the topic by Foner. Will be read by a member to evaluate and decision will be based on his recommendation.  On the second round, this was selected to be discussed in October.

The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery by Eric Foner. 4.6 stars, 448 pages. A definitive account of Lincoln's lifelong engagement with the nation's critical issue: American slavery. A master historian, Eric Foner draws Lincoln and the broader history of the period into perfect balance. We see Lincoln, a pragmatic politician grounded in principle, deftly navigating the dynamic politics of antislavery, secession, and civil war. Lincoln's greatness emerges from his capacity for moral and political growth.Won the Pulitzer Prize for history, the Bancroft Prize and the Lincoln Prize.  Here is The New York Times review of the book. Here is a video discussion of the book by author Foner.

Agincourt: Henry V and the Battle That Made England by Juliet Barker.  4.5 stars, 464 pages. Waged in 1415, the Battle of Agincourt still captivates. It is the classic underdog story, and generations have wondered how the English--outmanned by the French six to one--could have succeeded so bravely and brilliantly. The book describes both the lead up to the battle and its aftermath. Here is a review of the book.

1215: The Year of Magna Carta by Danny Danziger and John Gillingham. 4.4 stars, 336 pages. The events leading up to King John’s setting his seal to the famous document at Runnymede in June 1215 form this rich and riveting narrative that vividly describes everyday life from castle to countryside, from school to church, and from hunting in the forest to trial by ordeal. Here is the History Net review of the book. Here is a brief video on the book.

And Now for Something Completely Different

Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis by Robert  D Putnam (Only available in hardcover and ebook, but affordable.) 4.4 stars, 400 pages (278 pages of text.) A groundbreaking examination of the growing inequality gap from the bestselling author of Bowling Alone: why fewer Americans today have the opportunity for upward mobility. (Walter Isaacson called this the most important book of the year, perhaps the decade.) Here is a video of an interview with Putnam on the book. Selected for September.




Jun 13, 2015

The Life of Frederick Douglass: American Icon

Frederick Douglass circa 1774

Ten members showed up at the Kensington Row Bookshop on a lovely Wednesday evening to discuss Frederick Douglas and his times. (Check with Eli, who runs the Bookshop, if you want to purchase a previously owned copy of one of the books discussed by the book club.)

The discussion was based on Douglass' own writings. Frederick Douglass published three autobiographies which are all still in print:
Members present had read different ones of these books.

1845 Autobiography

Frederick's Biography (See this timeline of his life)
The following biographical sketch is provided for the reader. The members of the club had of course already read one of his books and checked other materials to gain a basic understanding of the events of his life. Thus we did not need to cover this material.
Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey (1818-1895) was born a slave on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. He lived there as a slave until he escaped in 1838. He never knew his father but believed him to be white. His mother, black, a slave field hand, saw him nights after work until he was two years old, but thereafter he lived with his maternal grandmother; she was also a slave. He moved to the Wye House Plantation when he was seven, and lived there for several years.

Eventually, however, he was loaned to the Hugh Auld house in Baltimore where he was the older companion and servant to the white child of that household. Hugh's wife, Sophia, there began to teach Frederick the alphabet and continued to do so until her husband discovered the lessons and ended them. Frederick, however, had learned that symbols represented sounds, and that the sounds related to strings of symbols could be words. He obtained a speller and a book of speeches and continued to learn to read. Indeed, he read everything he could get his hands on. Later, observing the use of letters to mark portions of boats in the Baltimore boatyards, he taught himself to write, making use also of his young charge's cast off spelling books.

In 1833, his owner Thomas Ault, reclaimed Frederick and began to assign him duties as a field hand. Dissatisfied with Frederick's behavior, Ault rented him to Edward Covey, a man known as a "slave breaker" -- one who rented slaves to work his fields and treated them brutally in order to break their spirits. After months of brutal treatment, Frederick physically confronted Covey; apparently the resistance Frederick showed resulted in Covey ameliorating Frederick's treatment.

Frederick's life improved, but his slavery continued after leaving Covey's establishment. In 1836 he with several others began to plot an escape to the north. They were betrayed, and Frederick with four of his companions was jailed. Perhaps strangely, Frederick's companions were released, and Frederick himself was sent back to Baltimore to begin to learn the trade of caulking ships in Hugh Ault's shipyard. Having a trade was a considerable step up for a slave!

Anna Murray
In 1837, Frederick met and fell in love with Anna Murray, a free black woman in Baltimore about five years older than he. In 1838, with Anna's help and travel papers loaned from a black seaman (sailors were allowed to travel on land from port to port with such papers), he escaped from slavery. He traveled by railroad and ship to New York City where he successfully found shelter with abolitionists.

Anna joined him there and they were married. They would be married for 44 years (until Anna's death) and have five children, four of whom survived to adulthood. It was at this point that they assumed the name Douglass (to make his apprehension by slave catchers less likely).

Fearing recapture in New York, the couple soon moved to New Bedford, Massachusetts. Frederick there worked as a day laborer and Anna went into domestic service, but they were safe both by having taken a pseudonym (Johnson) and by the abolitionist sentiment common in New Bedford. However, in New Bedford Frederick was to face threats and violence from white workmen (who felt threatened that blacks might threaten their livelihood).

In the course of his earlier life, Frederick had become religious, and in New Bedford joined the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church. He became a licensed preacher in 1839, and this helped him hone his oratorical skills. He held various positions in the church, including steward, Sunday School superintendent, and sexton. During his years as a slave he had also become an abolitionist, and in New Bedford he subscribed to an abolitionist newspaper and began to attend abolitionist meetings.

In 1841 Frederick was unexpected invited to speak at an abolitionist event, and spoke eloquently about his life as a slave. He was introduced to William Lloyd Garrison, perhaps the most influential abolitionist of the time. (Garrison already had been aware of Frederick's story.) Frederick then spent the next three years as a speaker for the abolitionist cause.

Frederick Douglass circa 1847-52
With the publication of his first autobiography in 1845, his safety from slave catchers and pro-slavery forces was further endangered. and he was sent to Europe for his safety; he had great success there, and described that trip as well as his life as a slave in his 1855 autobiography. His British supporters purchased him from his Maryland owner and gave him his manumission papers. They also provided him with 500 British pounds (nearly 2,500 U.S. dollars which in 1848 would buy a great deal). The latter gift enabled him to set up his own abolitionist newspaper, The North Star; he and his wife did so in Rochester, New York.

In the following years his already considerable fame grew. He also took positions that differed from those of many abolitionists. For example, he opposed sending freed slaves to a colony in Africa and he opposed secession (favored by some abolitionists since it would have left the northern states free and no longer required to return escaped slaves to their southern masters); Douglass recognized that the Union was a more sure path to the abolition of slavery in the south. He came to believe that the United States Constitution was created in the belief that slavery would eventually be abolished, and thus that the Constitution was sufficiently flexible to define government that would function after slavery's abolition. In this period he also became active in the women's rights movement. He quickly rose to prominence in that movement for the importance of his voice and paper, and as a man and former slave. He supported human rights generally.

In 1851, Frederick merged his paper with another, with the resulting titled  Frederick Douglass' Paper. That paper was published until 1860. In 1855 he published his second (updated) autobiography. In 1858 he met with John Brown several weeks before Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry; however, Douglass disapproved of Brown's plan to start an armed slave rebellion in the South. After the raid, Douglass fled for a time to Canada, fearing possible arrest as a co-conspirator.

According to Wikipedia:
By the time of the Civil War, Douglass was one of the most famous black men in the country, known for his orations on the condition of the black race and on other issues such as women's rights. His eloquence gathered crowds at every location. His reception by leaders in England and Ireland added to his stature.
His fame continued to grow. During the Civil War, he met with President Lincoln and recruited black troops for the Union army. In 1870, Douglass started his last newspaper, the New National Era. After his home in Rochester caught fire, Douglass moved to Washington.

In April 1876, Douglass delivered the keynote speech at the unveiling of the Emancipation Memorial in Lincoln Park in Washington, D.C. Mary Lincoln supposedly gave Lincoln's favorite walking-stick to Douglass in appreciation for the speech. In 1877, he met with Thomas Auld and the two were reconciled.

In 1877, Frederick Douglass also bought his final home -- Cedar Hill -- in Washington. He and Anna expanded the house from 14 to 21 rooms. One year after buying the house, Douglass purchased adjoining lots and expanded the property to 15 acres. The home is now preserved as the Frederick Douglass National Historic Site.

Frederick Douglass National Historical Site in the Anacostia neighborhood of Washington D.C.
Douglass' final autobiography, published first in 1861 and in revised form in 1892 describes:
  • His Appointment by Gen. Grant to Accompany the Santo Domingo Commission;
  • Also to a Seat in the Council of the District of Columbia; 
  • His Appointment as United States Marshal by President R. B. Hayes; 
  • His Appointment to Be Recorder of Deeds in Washington by President J. A. Garfield
He served as president of the Reconstruction-era Freedman's Savings Bank which went bankrupt in 1874, mere months after Douglass became its president.

Hellen Pitts Douglass
In 1888, he was appointed Consul General to Haiti, and in 1889 he was appointed Charge d'Affaires for Santo Domingo as well as Minister Resident to Haiti.

After Anna died in 1882, in 1884 Douglass married again, to Helen Pitts, a white woman. She is a direct descendant of John and Priscilla Alden and a cousin to Presidents John and John Q. Adams. (Faced by controversy over this marriage, Douglass said his first wife was of the same race as his mother and his second wife of the same race as his father -- a perfect retort.)

Thus Frederick Douglass', born a slave, son to a black, woman field hand, died in 1895 a world famous advocate for human rights, who owned a mansion, and who had held a number of important private and public offices.

1855 Biography

How Did Frederick Douglass Rise to Such Prominence?

This was the topic of some discussion at the club meeting. Several members commented on the luck involved. In his 20 years a slave he might well have died of disease, been killed, or been sold into slavery in the deep south from which escape would have been less possible. He was lucky to have had lived in a house where the wife was willing to teach him to read, and where materials were present that enabled him to learn more. He was lucky to have become religious and to have had the opportunity to hear preaching, which no doubt included some minsters who could deliver a great sermon, Having been implicated in an escape attempt, he was lucky not to have had steps taken by his owner to make further attempts much more difficult. He was lucky to have come to Garrison's attention, and to be added to the cadre of traveling speakers for abolition. In his second book he himself describes the good luck that made him famous in Britain on his arrival, and he was lucky that his success in Britain was publicized in the United States. (That luck apparently held through his later life as he progressed from success to success.)

We also commented that he was very talented. By any standard, the prose in his books demonstrates that he was intelligent, articulate, and well able to manage his own life and that of his family. Speeches included as appendices in later volumes show that Douglass clearly understood the difference in writing to be read and writing to be delivered orally. He speeches not only are clear, but the language flow lends itself to oratory and is almost poetic; the speeches build to high points apparently by the author's plan.

It was noted that this visible brilliance must have contributed to Douglass' early success. One of the early claims of the proponents of slavery was that the Africans were incapable of civilization, and that their lives were better under the ownership of whites. The argument went: "After all, the natives in Africa were spear toting tribal people. As slaves here, they were noted for their singing and dancing" There were other escaped slaves who could speak about the life of slaves from personal experience. However, few if any could in the very nature of their writing or oratory demonstrate that they, the former slaves, were in no way inferior to their readers, their audiences, or to the slave owners themselves. Douglass clearly made that demonstration in his books, in his speeches (and probably in his newspapers).

It was pointed out in our meeting that other black men had demonstrated the same thing, albeit in other countries.
  • Alexander Dumas, the great French writer, was the son of an enslaved African woman. 
  • Abram Petrovich Gannibal appears to have been born in Central Africa, but was stolen by the Ottomans, ransomed by the Russians and brought to the court of Peter the Great. Raised in the Emperor's household, he eventually rose to become a prominent member of the imperial court in the reign of Peter's daughter Elizabeth. After Peter's daughter Elizabeth became the new monarch in 1741, Gannibal rose to the rank of major-general, and became superintendent of Reval (now Tallinn, Estonia), a position he held from 1742 to 1752. 
  • Gannibal was the great grandfather of the Russian author and poet, Alexander Pushkin.

The 1881/1892 Autobiography

What Was the United States Like that Douglass' Rise was Possible?

This topic was not well covered in the discussion, but it seems important. Abraham Lincoln would be elected president in 1860, states began to secede from the Union late that year, the Civil War began in 1861, the emancipation proclamation was issued in 1863 freeing slaves in the Confederate states, and slavery was abolished and all remaining slaves were emancipated in 1865 -- the institution of slavery was central to the war between the states. Abolition and secession were dominant issues in Frederick Douglass' life from birth in 1818 until the end of the Civil War; the status and treatment of the freed slaves remained of great public importance and personal importance to Douglass for the rest of his life.

1841 was a propitious time for a young man to begin his career as an abolitionist, and especially propitious for a young black man who could write well, speak well, knew the issues, and was an escaped slave. Douglass took full advantage of the opportunities that were provided, establishing a reputation as a speaker, publishing a best selling book in 1845, making a splash in Britain in the following two years, establishing an abolitionist paper on his return, and publishing another widely circulated book in 1855. As the Whig party was breaking apart and the Republican Party was soon to elect a president, Douglass' paper not only was prominent in the abolitionist camp, but he was right on a number of issues where other abolitionists turned out to be wrong. Moreover, he had broadened his appeal by supporting the relatively nascent movement for women's suffrage. Thus he was well positioned to have influence on Lincoln during the Civil War, and on Johnson and Grant during Reconstruction and in the war's aftermath.

Again, as the Republicans retained office after the Civil War and sought to appoint appropriate people to public office, Douglass was a smart, articulate black man. He perhaps seemed a natural representative for the USA as President Grant sought to establish a U.S. presence in the Caribbean (Spain still had colonies there, and other European empires were scrambling for territorial expansion; France had tried to absorb Mexico during the Civil War).

Economic issues kept the topics of abolition and secession before the public. 
  • In 19th century America, cotton was king. Southern plantation owners were making a fortune growing cotton (and rice in South Carolina) but believed that they needed the institution of slavery to do so. Mill owners in England and New England were making a fortune by manufacturing cotton cloth from the cotton grown and harvested in the South. In border states of Virginia and Maryland, where the profits from tobacco were failing as the crop was depleting the soils in large areas, the internal slave trade to supply the mortally dangerous plantations of the South became a profit point. 
  • In the North, family farms were where much of the economic action was to be found; immigrant working in the urban businesses of the northern cities didn't want competition from blacks, much less from slaves. Northerners tended to favor free labor, believing it to be necessary for the long term growth of the nation; they also tended to believe that the future of the nation was to be in manufacturing rather than agriculture. 
Many in the north saw slavery as an ethical and religious issue, and the enslavement of men and women and their brutal treatment as profoundly immoral. Apologists for slavery in the South claimed southern slaves to be happier and living better lives than northern "wage slaves", asking which system was more immoral. Southern ministers pointed to biblical references to slavery, indicating that it was a deeply established custom in Christianity.

The Autobiographies

As autobiographies, these seem somewhat lacking in details of Douglass' life. Thus, one member of the club asked for clarification as to who Douglass married and whether he had children. Of course, the early books were hiding identities to protect slaves and people who had helped Douglass from retaliation. Thus names, dates and places one would expect to find in a normal autobiography were not present. Only the guilty slave owners and their instruments were so identified. On the other hand, as they were written the early books were very effective abolitionist tracts -- making points again and again against the institution of slavery!

As time passed, Douglass was able to safely reveal more and more details about his past. In 1892, long after emancipation and reconstruction, he could have feared little from revealing details from half a century or more in the past. Still the books often seem more tracts against slavery than memoirs of the very interesting life of an American icon.

Other Points

One member suggested that the books about Frederick Douglass might be regarded as cultural history, rather than the political history or economic history that the club usually reads and discusses. Douglass was after all, famous for his speeches and books, a publisher is significant news papers. The abolition movement might be seen as a cultural movement.

Another member offered the contrasting suggestion that the books were actually political history. Frederick Douglass was engaged in a political movement (and later in his life received a number of political appointments; in fact, Douglass was nominated for Vice President of the United States by a small political party and was in 1872 the presidential elector at large for the State of New York, and took that state's votes to Washington, D.C.)

We noted that the books raised the issue of the effect of the institution of slavery on the white population. In order to keep slaves as slaves it became necessary to institutionalize such things as keeping slaves uneducated, using corporal punishment on slaves who disobeyed their owners of drivers, and employing mercenaries to catch escaping slaves. The necessity for these aspects of institutionalized slavery fed back on the beliefs and behavior of the whites, and the feedback was not something of which we club members approved.

Although the club had previously read about slavery, were again shocked by the descriptions of the treatment of slaves. Douglass' descriptions, told by someone who had been on the receiving end of that treatment, were exceptionally heartrending.

We noted that the people of the slave holding states held various positions on slavery. Ministers had to deal with the morality of the institution and tended to find justifications for slavery in scripture. Douglass differentiated between one of his masters who he thought to be gentlemanly, who treated his slaves well, versus others of his masterswho were of lower social status and did not treat slaves equally well. Slave drivers were seen as much less concerned with the morality of their behavior, and very likely to use physical force on the slaves, sometimes to excess. The merchants in the slave trade and the people who drove manacled slaves from the north where they had been bought to their new southern masters are portrayed by Douglass as without any moral compass.

Racial prejudice seems always to have been closely related to the issue of slavery, and we were diverted into some discussion of prejudice. As the members present tended to share views that racial prejudice is reprehensible, there was little disagreement. A member brought our attention to the increasing portion of multiracial people in America; the current ethnic classification system used for schools and statistics does not seem to function very well for kids trying to describe a multiracial heritage. Indeed, as people self declare race, some seem to do so to "game the system" seeking to put down whatever race they think will be most favored in the specific circumstances.

A member told a story from  one of his friends: the friend after living in Africa for a number of years was asked whether a third party was black or white; the friend simply didn't know. The member telling the story believed his friend; another member found the story simply incredible. We noted that President Obama's father was Kenyan and his mother American -- a clearly black father and a clearly white mother; Obama has chosen to define himself as black. Someone commented that almost all people in the United States defining themselves as black have some European ancestry.

One member suggested that it was time to get rid of the outdated concept of "race". Scientists are moving now toward individualized medicine. Based on an individual's genetic endowment and other factors, doctors will increasingly better understand illness; they will better be able to prescribe treatment that will benefit the individual patient and avoid treatments that have excessive risk to the individual patient. For this to come to pass, we will need to test treatments on very specific groups of people -- not large, heterogeneous groups like whites, blacks, Hispanics, etc. The current government classifications, which call for people to self identify race and are never checked for accuracy anyway, are counterproductive to these medical purposes. Indeed, members pointed out that people now frequently declare themselves of a specific race to gain advantage in selection processes, rather than in an effort to be factual.

It was not clear if the low attendance was due to the topic itself, to the club's failure recently to recruit new members to replace those who stop attending meetings (a natural attrition), or to a normal drop off in summer. It was noted that the number of downloads of the summaries of discussions is trending much higher, reaching 185 for last months discussion. Still, Frederick Douglass seemed of considerable interest to those present. At least one member expressed support for occasionally reading books by people who had lived the history rather than always reading recently published books.

One of our members posted these on his blog prior to the meeting:

Jun 1, 2015

Potential Books for August, 2015



Books on the History of Texas (thanks to Allen W.)

There are two I'd recommend.  They are equally good, although I think Brands is a better writer & story teller, but Davis' book is considerably shorter.  Both give background on the Spanish colonial period and Mexican independence, then cover the Texas revolution of 1835-36 and its aftermath through the Civil War.

Lone Star Nation: The Epic Story of the Battle for Texas Independence by H.W. Brands. 4.4 stars, 608 pages (526 of text).

Lone Star Rising: The Revolutionary Birth of the Texas Republic by William C. Davis. 4.7 stars (3 reviews)m 376 pages. SELECTED

Lone Star: A History Of Texas And The Texans by T. R. Fehrenbach does cover the history of the state into the 20th century and is well written.  But, I thought Fehrenbach was at times too much of a flag-waver and the book is quite long at nearly 800 pages.  4.5 stars, 792 pages (726 of text).

Another possibility is a military history of the Texas Revolution written by Stephen Hardin.  This is a very well written, lively account, but it focuses on the military actions, rather than the loony politics of the Revolution.  It's not that much of an oversimplification to say that no one was in charge, or too many were.  Very chaotic.  This book is a good read and short; Hardin is a good writer and story teller.  However, this does not cover anything beyond the revolution.

Texian Iliad: A Military History of the Texas Revolution, 1835-1836 by Stephen L. Hardin. 4.6 stars. 344 pages.

There is a good, scholarly book on the political side of the revolution and its aftermath, including sections on how Hispanics were marginalized by the fledgling Texas government, which also ratified a constitution that made it illegal to abolish slavery.  However, the book is very dry and not for the casual reader.  I brought a real interest in the subject to this book and had to struggle through it:

Texas Revolutionary Experience: A Political and Social History, 1835-1836 by Paul D. Lack 3.8 stars (4 reviews), 360 pages.

I think the best choice is probably Brands or Davis, as they cover a broader history of Texas, albeit only through the Civil War.  However, a lot of what characterizes Texas and it's people is its history as an independent republic (even though I think that was a bit of a sham).  It seems to affect how Texans relate to their status as part of the United States and the occasional rumblings of another possible secession from the United States (which is an even bigger sham to me).  Interestingly enough, Sam Houston (a mercurial figure; hard to get a real handle on him sometimes), who is (sort of) the George Washington of Texas, argued strenuously against Texas' secession in 1861.

Books on the Irish Revolution and Civil War (thanks to Chris H.)

This list was previously posted, but never acted upon.

Books on Women in U.S. History

Founding Mothers: The Women Who Raised Our Nation by Cokie Roberts. 4.0 stars, 384 pages (274 of text). There are some reader reviews of the hook on Goodreads. Here is a video interview with author Roberts on the bookWhile much has been written about the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, battled the British, and framed the Constitution, the wives, mothers, sisters and daughters they left behind have been little noticed by history. #1 New York Times bestselling author Cokie Roberts brings us women who fought the Revolution as valiantly as the men, often defending their very doorsteps. Drawing upon personal correspondence, private journals, and even favoured recipes, Roberts reveals the often surprising stories of these fascinating women, bringing to life the everyday trials and extraordinary triumphs of individuals like Abigail Adams, Mercy Otis Warren, Deborah Read Franklin, Eliza Pinckney, Catherine Littlefield Green, Esther DeBerdt Reed and Martha Washington–proving that without our exemplary women, the new country might have never survived.

Ladies of Liberty: The Women Who Shaped Our Nation by Cokie Roberts. 4.3 stars, 512 pages (394 of text). There are some reader reviews of the book on Goodreads. Here is a video interview with Cokie Roberts on the bookIn this eye-opening companion volume to the previous book Times bestselling author Cokie Roberts brings to life the extraordinary accomplishments of women who laid the groundwork for a better society. Recounted with insight and humor, and drawing on personal correspondence, private journals, and other primary sources, many of them previously unpublished, here are the fascinating and inspiring true stories of first ladies and freethinkers, educators and explorers. Featuring an exceptional group of women—including Abigail Adams, Dolley Madison, Rebecca Gratz, Louise Livingston, Sacagawea, and others—Ladies of Liberty sheds new light on the generation of heroines, reformers, and visionaries who helped shape our nation, finally giving these extraordinary ladies the recognition they so greatly deserve.

Capital Dames LP: The Civil War and the Women of Washington, 1848-1868 by Cokie Roberts. 4.4 stars, 512 pages (412 pagess of text). Here is a C-SPAN video of the author discussing the book. Here is a brief review of the book from the New York Times. The latest in what seems a long effort of this reporter, daughter of two members of Congress, to document the role of women in politics in U.S. history. Cokie Roberts marks the sesquicentennial of the Civil War by offering a riveting look at Washington, D.C. and the experiences, influence, and contributions of its women during this momentous period of American history. With the outbreak of the Civil War, the small, social Southern town of Washington, D.C. found itself caught between warring sides in a four-year battle that would determine the future of the United States.





May 15, 2015

Junipero Serra and the Spanish Colonization of California

Eleven members of the History Book Club met on Wednesday evening, May 13th, to discuss Junipero Serra: California's Founding Father by Steven W. Hackel. One member present had also read Junipero Serra, pioneer colonist of California by Agnes Repplier, first published in 1933. The meeting was held as usual at the Kensington Row Bookshop. (The bookshop has copies of the book available for purchase; contact them by email or phone: 301-949-9416 )

Earlier in the evening, BBC America's news program had aired a segment about the controversy over Serra. The Catholic Church is planning to canonize him during Pope Francis' upcoming visit to the United States; it would be the first time that the canonization ceremony has ever been performed in the USA. However, others -- notably native American groups -- are protesting on the grounds that the California missions he founded were the sites of injustices to their Indian converts, high death rates among the Indians, and the destruction of Indian cultures.

Tuesday the Pew Research Center released its most recent survey data on the changing U.S. religious landscape. The study showed a significant increase in portion of respondents that identified themselves as unaffiliated, with corresponding decreases in Evangelical Protestants, Catholics, and Mainline Protestants -- all since 2007. It was noted that the change is largely due to the major change of religious affiliation of young adults. We noted that these results move the United States closer to Western Europe in religious affiliation, while Africa, Asia and Latin America are showing increases in affiliation to major religions. The findings again lent interest to the biography of Junipero Serra and the Spanish evangelical movement in the 18th century that appears to have been successful in recruiting large numbers of American Indians to the Catholic religion.

The book was chosen to complement club readings on colonization of the eastern United States with a book on the very different experience in California. The east was colonized by the English, notably by English members of religious groups that traced their founding to the Reformation; the Puritans, Quakers and other early colonists were at odds with the English government and its official state religion. (See the club's discussion of The Reformation: A History by Diarmaid MacCulloch.) On the other hand, California was colonized first by Franciscan missionaries deeply influenced by the Counter-Reformation; the Catholic Church was at the time the state religion of Spain and its colonies. The Franciscans were eventually replaced by secular parish priests when Enlightenment thought became more influential in Spanish and Mexican government. Thus the colonial history of California was quite different than that of New England, the mid-Atlantic states or the southern states.

Junipero Serra
Father Junipero Serra (November 24, 1713 – August 28, 1784) was born as Miquel Josep Serra i Ferrer to a family of humble means.
  • Hackel's book begins with Serra's early life in Mallorca. There he was given at age 16 to the Franciscan order to educate, became a Franciscan friar, was ordained a priest, and became a professor of philosophy training others. He took the name Junipero on formally becoming a Franciscan friar to honor of Fra Junipero, one of the first members of the Franciscan order and a direct follower of St. Francis. 
  • The second portion of the book deals with his time in what is now Mexico after he had volunteered to become a missionary; again he was placed as a teacher, he successfully held meetings at which he spoke to large numbers of Catholics to encourage strengthening and renewal of their faith, and eventually became a missionary to the Indians in the Sierra Gorda region. 
  • The final portion of the book focuses on Serra's work in Baja California as the Franciscan's sought to replace the Dominicans in the missions there, and on his most famous work starting nine of the 21 Spanish missions in Alta California (now the state of California).
The club members' discussion was quite animated. Several of the members present felt strongly that Serra should not be honored by canonization since he had used coercive force on the Indians; he had certainly beaten Indians and used soldiers to capture Indians who had left the missions in order to return them to the control of the missionaries. Another position in opposition to his being made a saint was that he was the formal representative of the Spanish government that saw the Indians as inferior and was guilty of cultural imperialism -- positions and attitudes he presumably shared. On the other hand, it was argued that his life was devoted to the Church and what the Church still regards as good works, and that he has been widely regarded as a saint ever since his death; miracles attributed to him have been certified by the Catholic Church hierarchy.

The Treaty of Paris Ended the War in North America in 1763. Source of Map

The Creation of the California Missions as an Instrument of State

Author Hackel states that it was the Spanish government that decided to colonize Alta California, and it did so largely to hold the territory for the Spanish crown. The government feared that other imperial powers might seek to colonize the region were the Spanish not to do so -- notably the Russians who had colonized Alaska and were trading for furs down the west coast of North America. It was noted that the British Hudson Bay company did in fact move into the West Coast in the early 19th century, as did the Russians and the Americans (at Astoria, the trading post established by John Jacob Astor's firm).

The first Spanish colonization began in 1770 and was conducted by soldiers and missionaries. The Franciscan missionaries were to convert California Indians to the state religion (Catholicism) and establish missions where communities of Indians would settle. The soldiers were to establish military posts, especially to protect San Diego Bay and Monterey Bay. Soldiers were also to protect the missions. It was noted that the Spanish state (through its colony of New Spain) paid the missionaries and provided supplies to the missions -- after all the church was part of the state and the creation of the missions was a governmental as well as a religious operation.

Santa Barbara Mission Church and Building as they exist today.
We noted that eventually the Spanish brought settlers to Alta California via the Anza Trail, which paralleled what eventually became the U.S.-Mexico border, and which eventually was used by the Fremont Expedition and American settlers of California. These first non-military, non-missionary settlers established pueblos in the San Francisco area, helping to secure the San Francisco Bay for the Spanish. (Soldiers were given bonuses if they married Indian women, thus presumably leading to another group of colonial settlers.)

Trying to Understand Serra in Historical Context

There was an effort by our club members to understand Father Serra in his own terms, He was a Spanish, Franciscan priest of the 18th century. He had taken vows of poverty, chastity and obedience (to his superiors in the Church); these vows were part of his order's dedication to follow in the footsteps of St. Francis. In Serra's time, such self sacrifice by people in religious orders was seen as highly meritorious, an indication of dedication to God.

One club member suggested that Serra would have believed that only people in a state of grace would live in heaven for eternity, and that active participation in the sacraments of the Catholic religion was the only way to assure that one would be in such a state at the time of one's death. Serra would have believed that pagan Indians of California broke many commandments -- they worshiped false gods. had multiple spouses without the sacrament of marriage, they stole, and they killed. As such they would be condemned to eternal damnation. Only through conversion to Catholicism could they have a chance for eternal bliss in heaven. Moreover, were they to leave the Catholic Church and return to their earlier beliefs and practices, they would be damned. Indeed. He would have believed that only through a complete cultural change, such as would be achieved by a convert leaving his/her Indian village and joining the mission community could his/her salvation be made likely. Of course, the change would be accompanied by living in a farming community, not a hunting/gathering tribe.

Statue of Father Junipero Serra in the U.S. Capitol Statuary Hall
It was also also pointed out that he was known to beat Indians who he perceived to have fallen into sin. It was suggested that such corporal punishment was common at the time, seen as comparable to the ways that parents disciplined their children. Indeed, Serra was thought to flagellate himself and to beat his breast with stones for religious purposes. When Indian converts left the mission community, sometimes soldiers were sent to bring them back. This was probably seen as assuring that they would not backslide, and would remain in the fold of their new religion.

It was noted that Serra and his fellow missionaries did not colonize Alta California to make money, to gain wealth, or even to gain power. Their purpose was more selfless. On the other hand, the missionaries presumably believed that they could gain much favor in the eyes of God (and the Church) by converting large numbers of Indians, teaching them about the Catholic religion, Confirming them as knowledgeable adult Catholics, and bringing them to live in the mission communities.

Serra personally in his years as president of the Alta California Franciscan mission community baptized thousands of children, instructed thousands of Indians in the Catholic religion, and confirmed an estimated 6000 people.  The missions he founded and the chain of missions that was extended after his death (in 1784) in the model he created baptized, instructed and confirmed many more. It was noted that there was some similarity to the way the Spanish colonized Texas, although in Texas they ran into the more warlike Comanche and Apache Indians (rather that the relatively peaceful California Indians). (The club read The Comanche Empire by Pekka Hamalainen in 2011).

What Can We Infer About Serra As a Person?

A member of the group read a passage from An Anthropologist On Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales by Oliver Sacks which suggested that Junipero Serra may have been a high functioning autistic person. Sacks in turn was actually quoting from a book by Uta Frith called Autism: Explaining the Enigma. The passage suggested that some people with autism behave in so other-worldly a fashion that they may have been seen as saintly (especially in the past before autism was discovered and described in the medical literature).
There may be some misunderstanding here. Junipero Serra took the name Junipero to honor a Junipero who was a follower of St. Francis of Assisi. That earlier Junipero has been thought to be autistic by some observers, and was a model of autism considered by  Uta Firth. He has been confused with Junipero Serra in at least one scientific paper. It seems unlikely that Father Junipero Serra was autistic.
It is difficult to understand a person from a different country who lived in a different century. We may make some assumptions:
  • Father Junipero Serra was probably academically gifted since he was selected from among seminarians to teach, and eventually became a professor of Philosophy. Moreover, at least a couple of his students followed him to the New World and worked with him for many years.
  • He probably became a gifted speaker on religious topics. One member said she was very impressed by the description of the arguments he had made in one of the missions to current Catholics (pages 48 and 49 of the book). He was asked to lead such missions to strengthen the beliefs of Catholic lay people several times.
  • He was apparently able to teach Indians, often via translators, which implies a different skill -- one of cross-cultural communication.
  • He was apparently able to accept the responsibilities of his vow of obedience to church superiors (even when he disagreed with what he was told to do).
  • On the other hand, he could differ strongly and publicly with civil authorities. Indeed, he was often very effective in defending his positions against civil society officials, especially when the disagreement affected the missions, the missionary efforts, or ecclesiastical matters. Hackel describes his quickly produced memo to the Viceroy of New Spain, written when Serra had gone to Mexico City to protest a local civil official's rulings, as very clear, logical and effective.
  • He seems to have had considerable leadership ability, regularly being chosen as a leader among the Franciscans. He seems to have gained the respect and affection of his subordinate Franciscans and the laity while leading the growth of the missions in California.
  • A member described his moral strength, demonstrated for example through his constant travel for years even while suffering from a very badly swollen and ulcerated leg.
  • He seems to have had little difficulty in living simply according to his vows of poverty. (He ate little, and that of what was available, dressed poorly, lived in the simplest of shelters, slept on a bed of boards, etc.)
It was noted that Confirmation in the Catholic Church is a sacrament, often administered to teenagers, that recognizes that they person receiving the sacrament has achieved a mature understanding of the tenants of the religion. (Father Serra was given special permission to perform the sacrament, which is normally administered by a bishop.) This was likened to Bar Mitzva in the Jewish religion,

This led to a question as to whether there were different levels of knowledge of church theology to be found in different groups in the Catholic Church, One answer was that there is a catechism used in the instruction of children, with age appropriate lessons, usually leading to adequate mastery for confirmation at about the age of puberty. From time to time the catechism is updated. However, others may have a far more sophisticated understanding of Catholic theology. A member mentioned a Jesuit priest friend of his who after receiving a PhD in Mathematical Logic at Cambridge University had continued to Louvain University in Belgium for a post doctoral degree in theology; he had a far more mature understanding of Catholic theology than the average lay person.

Serra's Impact on the Indians

It seems clear that Indian cultures in California were destroyed and Indian populations were decimated. It was suggested during our meeting that the loss of culture and death toll were much worse under the Mexican government than under the Spanish government it replaced in 1821, and were still worse after the Gold Rush of 1849 under the American government.

How great was the destruction under Serra? It was suggested that his missions in his lifetime were able to reach only a small portion of the Indians living in California (estimated at 300,000 at the time of his arrival). We wondered how much damage had been done by European diseases introduced by the previous landings on the California coast, how much was introduced by communication from other Indian tribes, and how much by the Franciscan missions. We did not have an answer. (It seems hard to believe that the decimation of the native American population of California by European diseases could have been averted by replacing Junipero Serra or even by not creating the mission network in the 18th century; that destruction seems to have happened almost everywhere in the Western Hemisphere, albeit earlier in some places and later in others.)
A reference states: "Of the 80,000 Native Americans baptized by the end of the mission era in the 1830s, according to the Los Angeles Times, some 60,000 had died, including 25,000 children under 10 years old." Hackel indicates that many of the baptisms were of children, and child mortality would presumably have been high in the Indian population even before the missions came to California. Still, the population density would probably have been higher in the mission communities than in the tribal communities living by hunting and gathering, and thus the transmission of lethal communicable diseases might have been higher in the missions. One doubts that Serra could have foreseen such an eventual result from his missionary efforts.
During the meeting, one member mentioned that he did not trust the high number of graves in mission church yards as an indicator of especially high mortality in the missions. We don't know the size of the population from which burials were drawn. In any case,  mortality rates were very high in the 18th century -- life expectancy was only 47 years in the USA in 1900. (It was mentioned that Father Serra may have lived as long as he did because he did not seek medical care; it is likely that doctors would have done more harm than good in the 18th century.) The member, citing Irish experience, noted that many people may have been buried in mission graveyards after the missions were closed, as Catholics sought burial in "holy ground". Another mentioned that statistics in Alta California were all probably doubtful in the 18th century.

The group seemed to agree that however high the mortality was in Serra's day, it was probably worse in the 19th century under the Mexican government, and almost surely later as people flooded into California after the discover of Gold and under the American administration.

One club member compared the cultural impact on the California Indians to that on the Africans who were brought to America as slaves. In both cases, Europeans deprecated the culture and even the humanity of the people. He noted an example in which the Ambassador of a South American country called the people living in his country with their native culture "savages". The self-assumed superiority of Europeans who set out to conquer and change Africans and native Americans was galling. Another member noted that cultures change, and that it is not the change so much as the way that it is imposed from outside that is so disturbing.

Spanish Colonial Chart of Racial Classifications in the Americas
A member mentioned the complex classifications that the Spanish used for social stratification in the American colonies, suggesting that class discrimination was confounded with racial discrimination. It was further mentioned that one of the factors leading to revolution against Spain was the discrimination against Criollos (whites born in the colonies) and the preference for whites born in Spain in appointments to governmental positions A member mentioned that he had been able to inspect church records in Indian towns in Mexico and Bolivia going back hundreds of years, and they only seemed to use a few classifications: white, Indian, African, mestizo (white and Indian). mulato (white and African) and zambo (all three genetic heritages).

A member had been a Peace Corps Volunteer in a group most of whose members worked with Indians in South America. He noted how unsuccessful most of the group members had been in helping those Indians to a better life. Six out of some 40 of the group went home in less than two years with nervous breakdowns; he attributed this to their high motivation and their lack of success in improving matters. It was suggested that the Catholic Church, with a centuries long time scale, may have been more successful because it takes a long time to affect economic development, especially in populations experiencing economic discrimination. The former Peace Corps Volunteer mentioned that the most successful volunteer in his group had in fact worked with a Catholic priest who had been helping a community for decades; that successful volunteer replaced the priest in his development projects when the priest became sick. The point of this discussion (which may not have been clear) is that Junipero Serra perhaps should not be too seriously criticized for failing to find a way to greatly improve the lives of California Indians in the relatively short time he worked with them; development is difficult and people continue to make serious errors in development efforts even today.

It was mentioned that there were some 30,000 members of mission communities when the missions were secularized in the 1820s. By that time the missions had large herds of cattle and were producing a lot of food; indeed the secularization of the missions was likened to the expropriation of the monasteries in England under Henry VIII in that both were strongly motivated by greed. In any case, apparently the members of the mission communities wanted the missions to remain and wanted their communities to continue to enjoy the support of the church and government.

We got into a discussion of slavery in the Spanish colonies. While Indians had been made slaves soon after Columbus, the Spanish King was convinced by church officials to outlaw Indian slavery. However, slavery by Africans and descendants of Africans remained legal in Latin America until the 19th century. It was suggested that Indians were still being enslaved and sold in the British colonies of North America after that process had been outlawed by the Spanish. It was also suggested that the Spanish categorized Europeans as superior to Native Americans, and Native Americans as superior to Africans -- explaining why Africans continued to be enslaved but not Indians.

Should Serra be Canonized?

This topic generated considerable discussion. One member held strongly that since Serra used force to coerce compliance by Indians, whatever the legitimacy might have been in his time, that is not legitimate today and should not be given the apparent support of the Catholic Church by canonization of Junipero Serra.

In a similar vein, another member said that the cultural imperialism of the Spanish overlords was so far from acceptable today that Serra should not be honored.

An alternative view was that Father Serra exemplified fidelity to the vows of poverty, chastity and obedience that are still used in parts of that Catholic Church today. The Church continues to be evangelical, and Father Serra appears to have sacrificed much to serve as a missionary, and seems to have been successful in starting missions and leading mission development; he converted thousands. Thus his career seems to have exemplified things that the Church then valued and values still.

It was noted that in his time the people around him venerated his saintly ways. Some of his students followed him into the new world missions and venerated him for a lifetime. He was chosen to teach seminarians, to give lectures to help the faithful renew their faith, and to lead lead missions and missionary communities. At his death. people around him thought him saintly and divided his possessions so as to have relics of Father Serra to cherish. Since he died, people have prayed for his intercession and miracles have been attributed to those prayers after close scrutiny by skeptical church officials. These are all things suggesting that he be canonized.

Final Comments

The group that met was composed of people from many religions, with few Catholics among us. The most active and knowledgeable Catholic among our regular discussion participants could not attend, so the arguments in support of Serra may not have been as well presented as they might have been. Still, the differences in opinion about this seminal figure in California history were aired and discussed.

The discussion did illuminate California colonial history and allowed the members of the club who are already relatively familiar with East Coast history so recognize differences. Those differences are still important as the regional cultures have evolved until today.

The discussion also focused on important issues of cultural imperialism and social and economic development.

Generally, the group seemed to find the book easy to read and interesting. It was certainly topical in a way that history books seldom are. Moreover, the book related to a long term interest the club members have shown in the history of Native Americans.

Here are some posts by one of our members on his blog:

Apr 20, 2015

Come to the Kensington Celebration of the Day of the Book!



Sunday, April 26, 2015, 11am-4pm
 Howard Avenue, Old Town Kensington, MD

Celebrate the Book * Street Festival * Rain or Shine 

This afternoon street festival celebrates the International Day of the Book with live music, author readings, open mic, activities for children and adults, storytellers, ...and books, books, books! Local authors, bookartists, publishers, booksellers, and literary groups line Howard Ave in Historic Old Town Kensington to show, sell, and discuss their works. All activities are free, rain or shine. Come celebrate with us! 

Some members of the History Book Club will be present, signing their books. 



Apr 11, 2015

Local Kensington History Event

APRIL 28:  Chris and Ed Hyland from the Bantrak Club will have a small train and trolley display and will speak on the Kensington Trolley line.  You’ll enjoy the stories related to the trolleys as well as the history of the line. Chris is a long time and quite active member of the History Book Club.

MEETING DETAILS -  All are welcome at KHS programs.  These are held at the Town Hall, 3710 Mitchell Street, in Kensington, on the ground floor.  There will be coffee and cookies at 7:00 p.m. followed by the Program at 7:30, and a brief business meeting.

Apr 10, 2015

Sea of Glory: The History of the U.S. Exploring Expedition

On the evening of  Wednesday, April 8th, eleven members of the History Book Club met at the Kensington Row Bookshop. The next day would be the 150th anniversary of Lee's surrender to Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse. That surrender ended Civil War fighting in Virginia and assured the failure of the Confederacy, the survival of the Union and the end of chattel slavery in the United States of America. The following week would mark 150 years since the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. Clearly 150 years ago America changed forever.

The club met to discuss Sea of Glory: America's Voyage of Discovery, The U.S. Exploring Expedition, 1838-1842 by Nathaliel Philbrick.
The U.S. Exploring Expedition (U.S. Ex. Ex.) consisted initially of six sailing ships of the U.S. Navy and 346 men, including officers, sailors and seven scientists. One of the ships would disappear en route to a rendezvous, never to be seen again. One would sink in the mouth of the Colombia River. One, the supply ship, would be sent back to the United States early in the voyage. One would be replaced at a mid point. More than 20 crew members died during the four year voyage, and others would be replaced; in total more than 500 men took part in the expedition.

The U.S. Ex. Ex. was led by Charles Wilkes, who was young for the command of such an ambitious undertaking; he was only a Lieutenant, also quite junior in rank for such a command. He was, however, experienced in making naval charts and familiar with the best methods and instruments for the purpose of the day. The other officers were similarly young and of relatively low rank for the responsibility they would bear. The scientists were experts in various descriptive sciences.

Perhaps the most significant purpose of the expedition was to produce charts to help the American whaling fleet reduce its losses from shipwrecks. Thus the U.S. Ex. Ex. was to chart Cape Horn and the southern tip of South America, many Pacific Islands, the coast of Oregon Territory and the Puget Sound. It was also to explore toward the South Pole and if land was encountered (as had been reported by whalers), to chart some of that land. Finally, it was to make scientific collections of plants, animals and artifacts of native cultures, as well as to study those cultures and their languages.

Source
The Science and Map Making

The U.S. Ex. Ex. produced some 240 charts. Members of the club noted that the chart of the Pacific Island of Tarawa produced by the Expedition was still the best available to the U.S. forces as late as the battle for the island in World War II.

A member mentioned that her father had been exempted from regular military service during World War II, and she later learned that because of his marine chart making expertise he had been recruited to make wartime charts of Pacific Islands. Another mentioned a friend, who had been a naval officer surveying charts off the coast of Alaska; the friend said he had loved the job except that the sailors on the ship kept jumping ship -- willing to walk a hundred miles in the wilderness to the nearest town rather than continue the job of surveying that coast. Charting dangerous waters in adverse climates is a tough job even in modern ships.

The U.S. Ex. Ex. brought a huge collection of plants, animals, and artifacts back to the United States. The were exhibited in the Patent Building for some 15 years drawing 100,000 visitors a year. Later those materials were to form a significant portion of the original collection of the Smithsonian. We noted that for the descriptive sciences of botany and zoology, such collections are the basis for taxonomic studies. Often it takes decades before a final taxonomy is agreed upon, and sometimes new species are identified from museum collections very long after the item in question entered the collection. Moreover, good taxonomy is a necessary basis for almost all further work in those sciences.

(Similarly, the collections of artifacts and the dictionaries of native languages made before the native cultures had extensive contacts with the outside world are still invaluable to anthropologists and ethnologists.)

As a result of prodding and lobbying by Charles Wilkes, who himself quickly produced a five volume history of the U.S. Ex. Ex., the Congress continued to fund the scientific work necessary to understand and document the materials collected by the Expedition; thus scientific works based on the Expedition findings came out for years after the ships returned. The earlier Lewis and Clark expedition had failed to follow up its explorations with published science.

Author Philbrick wrote that the U.S. Ex. Ex. led to the creation of
  • the Smithsonian Institution (as a scientific organization as well as a museum), 
  • the United States Botanical Garden (to house and display the live plants from the Expedition), 
  • the United States Hydrographic Office and 
  • the Naval Observatory. 
Thus the Expedition was instrumental in the creation of some of the first important scientific and technological organizations in the United States. Moreover, after the U.S. Ex. Ex., the Congress came to accept that the financing of science and technology was a function of the federal government.

The American Museum of Natural History in New York was not founded until 1869. Charles Peale opened a museum to the public in Philadelphia on July 18, 1786 and his son Rembrandt Peale opened a museum in Baltimore in 1814, but public museums were rare in the early days of the United States. However, private individuals had collections of curiosities and there was considerable public interest in seeing exhibits of materials from other lands and from the frontier.

Evidence was produced by the U.S. Ex. Ex. scientists in support of a proposal by Charles Darwin; he had suggested that as volcanic islands of the Pacific sank, the coral reefs surrounding them grew, thus maintaining the upper levels near the surface of the sea. In this way, after eons of time there would remain only a coral reef enclosing a lagoon and the underwater remains of a volcano. The U.S. Ex. Ex. also produced evidence that volcanic islands occurred in linear chains, with the youngest volcanoes at one end and the oldest and most eroded volcanoes at the other end; this finding was an important piece of evidence leading to the theory of plate tectonic motion.

Perhaps the most telling comment by author Philbrick is that prior to the U.S. Ex. Ex., while some people had done science in the the United States (and the colonies from which it was formed) they were amateurs; it was only after the Expedition that someone could plan to make a career as a professional scientist, earning a living from his scientific work.

Several members of the group were high school teachers, and they asked why the U.S. Ex. Ex. was not part of the High School history curriculum. One answer was that the Expedition had been created under the administration of Andrew Jackson, but returned when John Tyler was in office. The Tyler administration was not willing to give credit to Jackson's initiative. Another reason suggested was that there were courts martial after the voyage which reduced public acclaim for the Expedition's work. Still another reason proposed was the history of anti-intellectualism in American life. (A member took a crack at the question in a blog post after the meeting.)

The Route of the U.S. Exploring Expedition
The Adventure

In this book, author Nathaliel Philbrick chose to emphasize the adventures experienced by the members of the Expedition. There was certainly plenty of adventure in the round the world trip made in sailing ships in the first half of the 19th century.
  • The U.S. Ex. Ex. not only sailed around Cape Horn, one of the most dangerous places in the world for sailing ships, but stayed there to chart the region. It seems that one ship was lost with all hands in that effort.
  • Several of the Expedition's ships then went south, finding a channel through the ice toward the South Pole. The U.S. Ex. Ex. was one of the first if not the first expedition to make sight the Antarctic continent. Philbrick describes how it dealt with iceburgs, storms, dangerous lee shores, and freezing cold to chart 1500 miles of the coast.
  • Then after a brief stop at Valparaiso, the Expedition went on to the Fiji Islands where its members charted the dangerous waters, faced angry and warlike natives who were cannibals (yes, they would eat members of the expedition that they killed or captured). A member who had lived in Valparaiso described it as one of the greatest places in the world to live; he would certainly have jumped ship there rather than face what was still before the men on the U.S. Ex. Ex..
  • On landing in beautiful Hawaii, the leader of the expedition chose to climb its highest volcano -- over 14,000 feet in altitude. When the locally hired bearers could not continue, he sent back for sailors to carry the heavy equipment and supplies to the top of the mountain (in order for Lieutenant Wilkes to measure the local gravity). That involved a difficult climb over sharp and cutting lava surfaces, which were snow covered at the higher elevations of the volcano. Of course, at the top there was some danger of being killed by gases from the caldera or even by falling into red-hot lava. The crew built huts at the very peak, where they experienced a storm with hurricane force winds and sub freezing temperatures.
  • A U.S. Ex. Ex. ship was lost trying to navigate the mouth of the Columbia River. It is one of the most dangerous places in the world were some 2000 ships have been lost -- the equivalent of one per month for more than 150 years. As the ship was breaking up, grounded on shoals, a small boat went out from shore again and again, successfully rescuing the entire crew. Then a small group from the Expedition traveled by land from the mouth of the Columbia River to San Francisco harbor, pioneering in unexplored territory.
We discovered what seemed to be a gender divide in the group over this account of the adventures of the members of the Expedition. Several women member of the group found this discussion excessive if not unnecessary. On the other hand, the men in the group seemed to find the book's combination of history of science and history of an adventurous voyage to be quite interesting and readable. We eventually seemed to settle on an opinion that the author had a right to choose how he would tell the story of the Expedition, but that readers also had a right to avoid the book if they objected to its detailed description of the dangers and hardships faced by its members.

The People and the Interactions

Charles Wilkes
A considerable portion of the book focuses on Charles Wilkes and his relations with the officers and crew that served under him.Wilkes was an experienced surveyor, who knew about the latest equipment and techniques of his time; he had successfully led a smaller team to chart U.S. coastal waters. However, he lacked the seamanship and the experience in command at sea that would have been expected of someone in command of such an expedition.

Many more senior officers had been considered for the command; some had refused it (perhaps wisely) while others had been dropped from consideration for various reasons. Wilkes was given the command of the Expedition, but denied the rank of Captain that should have gone with it, and denied the title of Commodore that would normally be attached to someone in command of a group of navy ships.

The navy is rank conscious, and the U.S. Ex. Ex. took place many years after the War of 1812. Promotions had been scarce for decades and officers were probably more concerned with rank than they might otherwise have been. It was noted that many of these young officers would later serve through the war with Mexico and the Civil War, when promotions were frequent, and that those officers would reach very high rank. Wilkes, without specific authorization to do so, assumed the uniform of a navy captain and flew the ensign of a commodore for years on this voyage. We assumed that his doing so was noted by his junior officers with disapproval. He also sometimes assigned commands to officers when other, more senior officers were available in the flotilla; that clearly engendered resentments.

We also noted that Wilkes, who had been close to his officers on a previous charting effort and at the start of the U.S. Ex. Ex., seems to have changed behavior radically early in the four year voyage. He became isolated from his officers and his discipline became more harsh. Philbrick suggests he became arbitrary and sometimes unjust in his treatment of subordinates. We noted that in the 1840s it was common for ship's captains to isolate themselves from crew and officers, and that discipline was much harsher than would be accepted today. Books by Patrick O'Brian and the Mutiny on the Bounty Trilogy were cited, as was Rocks and Shoals: Naval Discipline in the Age of Fighting Sails.

Wilkes' orders were secret, which seemed more appropriate for a military expedition than a scientific and technical one. That secrecy was likely to have contributed to the anxiety of the crew. Indeed a member commented on the ward room reaction as each new destination was disclosed, and each seemed even more dangerous than the previous ones. Still, secret orders to captains and commodores were common at the time.

It was noted that long naval voyages in sailing ships were subject to mutinies. Sailors might jump ship in port and never return. Strong disciplinary measures were thought at the time to be necessary. A member noted the danger of judging actions of people in the past by the standards of our time.

Author Philbrick draws heavily on letters home, journals and memoirs of the voyage from the junior officers, and those documents show strong aversion to Wilkes and disagreement with his actions. Philbrick draws especially heavily on the writings of William Reynolds, one of Wilkes most effective critics. Reynolds had been very positive about Wilkes early in the voyage, but turned against him for the latter years of the Expedition; he is described also as a very effective writer. Certainly a group of those officers brought charges against Wilkes and testified against him in Wilkes' court marshal (he was found guilty of only one charge by the senior officers on the panel and continued in the navy rising ultimately to the rank of admiral.)

A confusion was unearthed. Charles Erskine, a crewman in the U.S. Ex. Ex. much after the Expedition published Twenty Years Before The Mast: With The More Thrilling Scenes And Incidents While Circumnavigating The Globe Under The Command Of The Late Admiral Charles Wilkes 1838-1842; that book is quite critical of Wilkes and Philbrick draws on Erskine's writings occasionally. A much more famous book is Two Years Before the Mast by Richard Henry Dana, a cousin of one of the U.S. Ex. Ex. scientists. Several of our members were familiar with the latter book which describes a voyage made at about the same time as the U.S. Ex. Ex., but shorter and to California. Some had apparently mistaken Dana's book for Erkine's book.

Most of the members present seemed to accept author Philbrick's apparent position that Wilkes lacked many of the command skills that would have made for a better shipboard environment. Others pointed out that his skill as a surveyor, his iron will, his dedication and perseverance in the carrying out the tasks set for the Expedition, and (yes) his leadership made the Expedition exceptionally successful. It was suggested by the latter members that while author Philbrick had mined existing sources extensively and considered the evidence carefully, he might be wrong in his conclusions about Wilkes. For the group as a whole, the question of Wilkes leadership remains open.

The Government

The book shows the federal government in the 1830s to be slow and indecisive in the authorization of the U.S. Ex. Ex.. Congress in the 1830s and 1840s seems unwilling to spend money on even important efforts for the promotion of commerce and trade. Politicians in both the Jackson and the Tyler administrations appear petty, and perhaps willing to put political advantage before the more general interests of the country; few seemed to fully appreciate the importance of the U.S. Ex. Ex. nor the magnitude of the task that was given to the Expedition leaders and members.

It was suggested that the 100,000 people a year visiting the U.S. Ex. Ex. exhibit for 15 years helped convince the politicians that funding science might gain them votes. A member commented: "What, ineffective government in the USA! Who would have thought?"

The Big Question

A member asked what seemed to be the big question -- why did the government assign so large a task to one big expedition rather than divide the tasks between two smaller expeditions? European governments were in fact mounting more but smaller expeditions at the time -- expeditions with far more limited objectives than those of the U.S. Ex. Ex..

It was suggested that there might have been several reasons for the U.S. government's choice. For example, there might have only been a limited number of officers available with the requisite skills to chart difficult shores, or there might not be enough of the needed equipment (very expensive at the time) to equip two expeditions, or that that was simply not the way the government chose to do it. ("There is the right way, the wrong way, and the navy way!") We failed to adequately explain to ourselves why that choice was made. 

It was noted that the class from which leaders were drawn in the United States in 1840 consisted of relatively few but quite distinguished families; Wilkes for example was the nephew of Elizabeth Ann Seton who established the first Catholic school and the first order of nuns in America; Wilkes' nephew, James Renwick, was a successful architect who among other projects designed "the Castle" building of the Smithsonian and the Renwick Gallery.

Final Comments

While the weather was finally nice for a meeting of the club, the turnout for the discussion was smaller than usual; there were reasons -- one person out of town, one or two not feeling well. Still with hundreds of downloads of the summaries of these discussions, we were surprised that a few more people don't come to the meetings.

The discussion was lively and spirited. People were caught up in the issues raised by the book. Perhaps the key issue discussed is why there is relatively little interest in how the modern world of our daily experience came to be. Certainly the history of science and technology is less frequently taught in schools than it might be.

For some of the member of the History Book Club, Sea of Glory was a page turner, combining important aspects of history with an adventure story and vivid descriptions of clashes among people dedicated to their professions and experiencing danger; for others, perhaps not so much.

Here is a blog post on the book by one of our members, written before the meeting.